Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7197Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields"
From: cjcountess
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:30
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:30
40 lines
4726 bytes
4726 bytes
Hi GSS I commend you for what you are doing with your work. I had the same idea as I too participated in enough discussions to generate a lot of thought and enough material to write a book. I've already written one book which includes a non mathematical scientific theory of everything and have since compiled enough to write another based around the controversial idea that c^2 is not just a mathematical conversion factor of energy to matter but is an actual conversion frequency at high end of EM spectrum where energy turns to matter. I reason and visualize this to happen because the wave takes on a circular or spherical geometry such as a standing satirical wave. Like you I believe that we can visualize this because I have done it and nobody can tell me otherwise. Maybe their vision and /or my description is not as clear as my vision but I am having fun arguing the case.. If you take a wave traveling at c in the horizontal direction and give it a equal and 90 degree angular speed of c in vertical direction, this is c^2. This is analogous to a horizontal line of an inch, times a vertical line of equal measure to equal a square inch.. If we draw an arc from the beginning of the horizontal line to end of the vertical line this creates a 90 degree arc which if constant creates a circle. This can represent the trajectory a wave under the influence of a centrifugal and a centripetal force at a 90 degree angle to each other resulting in circular motion might take. In 3d this would be spherical motion . see: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_11vv737cck and http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae694.cfm, If we start with a circular polarized wave like the one they ended up with on the website and continue the same logic and geometry to all dimensions of the wave, x-y and z, we should get a standing spherical wave. One question, did you think to include any of the Google dialogs to show the dynamism of the arguments or do they include too much google- gaga childish chatter that you'd rather exclude? And furthermore, is it copyrite infringement to publish other peoples input into the dialog or is it o.k. to include at least their responses to you. Would appreciate your thoughts on this. I read some of your book and think it is very inciteful. Conrad Countess
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<655b1710-4060-45a2-91f1-1cbc4de22b67@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<40567776-4f77-4932-b1bf-8b59e0e449f5@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <d7ph0ADlTEUIFwb5@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <469c8092-df7a-4915-a7b8-51e8c455013a@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <bgGQCXDYQPUIFwLb@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <Py94k.249$oY2.195@newsfe21.lga> <a71c1612-1943-447d-a113-2c9520a0a710@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <homeALCT93WIFw9K@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <RNX6k.5871$qa5.877@newsfe13.lga> <qqKdnSfpZrw41sHVnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@comcast.com> <fb96f872-5eb9-4cf3-a818-9e8d5b1da460@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <jYidnVWvWql8mP3VnZ2dnUVZ_hzinZ2d@comcast.com> <36fbcbc6-4d49-4b2d-a493-8369745961dc@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <UvKdnZ90Lty4j_3VnZ2dnUVZ_vzinZ2d@comcast.com> <49a59ebc-bbf5-4d22-abb7-627ae66122b1@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <3a17c44c-6946-41f8-ac76-0e23046ccce5@r37g2000prm.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,206ff459d40f3c02 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,206ff459d40f3c02 X-Google-Thread: f6c41,206ff459d40f3c02 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,9d33f445b4dc86da X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,206ff459d40f3c02 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf6c41,gidfa4c1,gid1038c2,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: cjcountess <cjcountess@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,fr.sci.physique,alt.sci.physics.new-theories Subject: Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields" Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 40 Message-ID: <655b1710-4060-45a2-91f1-1cbc4de22b67@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> References: <40567776-4f77-4932-b1bf-8b59e0e449f5@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <d7ph0ADlTEUIFwb5@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <469c8092-df7a-4915-a7b8-51e8c455013a@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <bgGQCXDYQPUIFwLb@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <Py94k.249$oY2.195@newsfe21.lga> <a71c1612-1943-447d-a113-2c9520a0a710@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <homeALCT93WIFw9K@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <RNX6k.5871$qa5.877@newsfe13.lga> <qqKdnSfpZrw41sHVnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@comcast.com> <fb96f872-5eb9-4cf3-a818-9e8d5b1da460@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <jYidnVWvWql8mP3VnZ2dnUVZ_hzinZ2d@comcast.com> <36fbcbc6-4d49-4b2d-a493-8369745961dc@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <UvKdnZ90Lty4j_3VnZ2dnUVZ_vzinZ2d@comcast.com> <49a59ebc-bbf5-4d22-abb7-627ae66122b1@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <3a17c44c-6946-41f8-ac76-0e23046ccce5@r37g2000prm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.26.106.9 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1214263823 26216 127.0.0.1 (23 Jun 2008 23:30:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.26.106.9; posting-account=SWr-zgoAAABXP_I1KRp8SBR28UDaox2f User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080418 Ubuntu/7.10 (gutsy) Firefox/2.0.0.14,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)