🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 9, 12:47 am, Asp Explorer <lpxepsa_alenv...@noos.fr> wrote:
> Pentcho Valev a écrit : d'invraisemblables sornettes.
>
> AAAAAAAAAAAA ma gauche, Albert Einstein, prix nobel, découvreur de la
> théorie de la relativité, à ma droite Pentcho Valev, cuistre, raté
> notoire et ignorant patenté. Qui va remporter cette impitoyable joute de
> l'esprit ? Le suspense est insoutenable, mais avant ça, le combat du
> siècle entre Mike Tyson et Woody Allen !
>
> --
> C'est à l'heure du repas
> qu'on voit les boules du chat

-----------
Einstein's E=mc2 is not confirmed in many aspects. It is confirmed, it
is scientific.
Information is available at
www.ajayonline.us

A part from www.ajayonline.us  is pasted below
                                               Discussion III
              E   is Proportional to  mc2    (E µ  mc2   or  E = Ac2
 M )

     E=  mc2 means, exactly energy is equal to mass annihilated times
c2.
There is no other possibility from E=  mc2.
 E= mc2 is confirmed in nuclear reactions i.e.(fission, fusion and
annihilation of matter and antimatter).But E= mc2 is  not confirmed
in. chemical reactions, volcanic reactions, in some astrophysical and
cosmological reactions and process of creation of mass before Big
Bang.
 In such cases the proportionality (E µ  mc2   or  E = Ac2  M) can be
justified.

                      The characteristic conditions of electron-
positrons annihilation process are different from chemical reactions
(nucleus remain unaffected e.g. burning of wood), and those of
chemical reactions are different from astrophysical or cosmological
reactions.

1. Hiroshima atomic explosion did not QUANTITATIVELY confirm E=mc2

 The first ATOMIC explosion at Hiroshima, of atom bomb known as
'Little Boy' [U235 kg] , weighing 49kg , has justified E µ mc2   (or
DE = Ac2(M). E=mc2 is not quantitatively confirmed in this regard.
E= mc2   will be quantitatively confirmed in this regard if
(i) E, energy emitted
(ii) (M , mass of bomb annihilated
both are quantitatively measured and should be consistent with E= mc2
But it has not been done at all [1], but it is regarded as confirmed
which is not correct.
The scientific reference [1] is

[1] Serber , R The Los Alamos Primer (U.S. Govt. first published as
LA1, April 1946),      declassified 1965 , annotated  book , 1992.
also R . Serber (editor) , The Los Alamos    Primer  pp. 38 (Univ. of
California Press, 1992)

Thus it is equally feasible to assume that the energy emitted may be
less than E=mc2 (or E  µ dmc2 or DE = Ac2DM) when reactants are in
bulk amount and various types of energies are simultaneously emitted.
Thus both the possibilities are equally probable until one is not
specifically rules out.

2.  E= mc2 is not QUANTITATIVELY confirmed in the MOST ABUNDANT
chemical reactions.


 Till date E= mc2 is not confirmed in the chemical reaction and reason
cited for this is that equipments are not enough sensitive [2].
[2]  Beiser Arthor, Concepts of Modern Physics. (McGraw Hill
International Edition,
     New York, 4th Edition)  pp. 25, 27-30,420-422 6(1987).

                       Consider burning of 1kg straw or paper or
petrol in controlled way, ashes, gases and energy produced can be
estimated. Even if  0.001 kg  or 1gm of matter is annihilated then
energy equal to 9×1013J (can drive a truck of mass 1000kg to distance
of 9×107 km) will be produced.
                    Until the equation is not confirmed in such
reactions, then scientifically it may be not be regarded as precisely
true in such cases. It is equally possible that energy emitted may be
less than predicted by E= mc2. Thus E µ  mc2 or DE = Ac2(M is equally
possible in chemical reactions.

3. How FIRST PARTICLE of mass created in the universe?
                  It can be explained on the basis of
The Big Bang theory (the biggest energy releasing process universe)
assumes that whole mass of universe (1055 kg, say) was in form of
'primeval atom' and then suddenly exploded.
  (i) According to E= mc2 this would have been created from energy
9×1071 J ( 1055×9×1016 J) but how this enormous amount of energy was
created in space out of nothing ?
                Thus one query leads to another query. Hence creation
of mass or energy in formation of 'primeval atom' is not consistent
with E=mc2, hence proportionality E  ( (mc2 ((E = Ac2DM), may be
considered.
   (ii)   This conflicting situation can be explained if DE = Ac2DM is
used and value of A (coefficient of proportionality) is
exceptionally-2 small in this particular case (A=1.111×10-122).
Hence significant amount of mass (1055kg) can be obtained from
infinitesimally small amount of energy (10-50 J). Thus it is
consistent.

4. Some existing experimental observations are not consistent with
E=mc2.
In laboratory it is confirmed [3-5]  that using thermal neutrons the
total kinetic energy (TKE) of fission fragments  that result from of
U235 and Pu239 is  20-60MeV less than Q-value (200MeV)  of reaction
predicted by DE= Dmc2 . Similarly mass of particle Ds (2317)  has been
found more than current estimates based upon  DE= Dmc2.  Thus in this
case E  µ dmc2 is justified.


 [3].  Hambsch, F.J.   et al.   Nucl. Phys.A, 491,p.56 (1989)
 [4].   Thiereus,  H.  et al., Phys. Rev. C, 23 P 2104 (1981)
 [5]  Bakhoum, E. G.   Physics Essays, Vol.15, No 1 2002
              (Preprint archive : physics/0206061)

Source    www.ajayonline.us