🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7406

Re: question: concept of photon wavelength

#7406
From: malibu
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:55
53 lines
3309 bytes
On Jul 17, 6:28 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 17, 9:59 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Tom Roberts wrote in sci.physics.relativity:
>
> > > martin wrote:
> > > > There is a question I have about the concept of wavelength of a photon.
>
> > > A photon has no intrinsic wavelength; indeed it's not clear whether the
> > > concept "wavelength" even applies to a photon. And there's also the
> > > difficulty of attempting to discuss "a" photon....
>
> > Then, Roberts Roberts, discuss the textbook formula
>
> > frequency = (speed of light)/(wavelength)
>
> > In a gravitational field, the frequency varies with the gravitational
> > potential V in accordance with the equation
>
> > f' = f(1+V/c^2)
>
> > which is confirmed experimentally. The speed of light also varies with
> > the gravitational potential in accordance with Einstein's 1911
> > equation
>
> > c' = c(1+V/c^2)
>
> > As you can see Roberts Roberts, f'=f(1+V/c^2) and c'=c(1+V/c^2) are
> > consistent. However you say Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) is
> > wrong but never give the correct equation. Why Roberts Roberts? Is
> > this some grand secret between hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult?
>
> > Pentcho Valev
>
> -----------
> and i n addition
> photon ave loength
> is th emsot simply todetect ecperimentally
>
> and th most simple*and acurate * indentity to
> measuere
> waht else can you demand from a physical entity
>
> is there another propertyof the photon
> that is more acurately defined and tested ??
>
> ATB
> Y.Porat
> ------------------------

frequency
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1184730940.994233.52420@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <4697af7c$0$25496$9a622dc7@news.kpnplanet.nl> <VsAmi.39603$Um6.2142@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net> <1184655555.223476.299960@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1184675328.328746.275310@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,8d632c40cc292adb
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,24ee896443df42d4
X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,24ee896443df42d4
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,24ee896443df42d4
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,24ee896443df42d4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  malibu <vegan16@accesscomm.ca>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique
Subject: Re: question: concept of photon wavelength
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:55:40 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <1184730940.994233.52420@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: <4697af7c$0$25496$9a622dc7@news.kpnplanet.nl>
   <VsAmi.39603$Um6.2142@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>
   <1184655555.223476.299960@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <1184675328.328746.275310@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.89.72.115
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1184730941 22142 127.0.0.1 (18 Jul 2007 03:55:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:55:41 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1184675328.328746.275310@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.89.72.115;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0