Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7444Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
From: jambaugh
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:17
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:17
23 lines
3075 bytes
3075 bytes
Sorcerer Androcles wrote: > Then grow up and fuck off, the basic equations of NM are what the basic equations of SR approximate to. I didn't dispute your facts. I criticize your childish attempt to get into a contest to see who can be the most profane. Let me crown you king of the universe and champion of all the kids cussin' and smoking tabaki behind the barn. You win the swearin' contest! All hail the Andy lord of the irrelevant insults! Now that that's out of the way.... Your abusive language impresses no-one in a positive way and if you have some point to make such as the obvious fact that Newtonian and Einsteinian mechanics agree in the small velocity limit then you've got to stop distracting people from your "vast intellect" with your 8th grade potty mouth tone. Yes I said potty mouth. That is the most apt description given the level of maturity you display. Again grow up. This is a public venue and you are behaving like a child. If you have anything relevant to say you will find people ignoring you entirely. As I now do.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1168712228.541964.195620@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!postnews.google.com!38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com> <XdBmh.242371$bz5.192605@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <1167795780.694882.237800@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <RNImh.298068$Pk.172981@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <1168213510.581626.53610@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com> <rcnoh.34610$Kh7.5214@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <1168703169.715641.208460@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <nG7qh.51808$QY6.12437@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!postnews.google.com!38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "jambaugh" <ego@jamesbaugh.info> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity Date: 13 Jan 2007 10:17:11 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 24 Message-ID: <1168712228.541964.195620@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com> <XdBmh.242371$bz5.192605@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <1167795780.694882.237800@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <RNImh.298068$Pk.172981@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <1168213510.581626.53610@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com> <rcnoh.34610$Kh7.5214@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <1168703169.715641.208460@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <nG7qh.51808$QY6.12437@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.168.107.205 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1168712236 32615 127.0.0.1 (13 Jan 2007 18:17:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:17:16 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <nG7qh.51808$QY6.12437@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.168.107.205; posting-account=Zpdfsg0AAAAdNz6L-gjTpkhKJm4SxYMG