Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?

Article View: sci.physics.relativity

Article #7443

Back to sci.physics.relativity Previous Next

#7443

From: karandash2000
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:36

37 lines
2618 bytes

Richard Hachel wrote:
> "sciencecool@yahoo.co.uk" wrote:
>
> > The relativistc variation of mass, time dilation, length contraction
> > > were existing before Einstein.
> > > Einstein simply used  then in his June 1905 paper,
> >
> > He did not.  He derived them is a new and different way.
>
>  But false.
>
>  Il n'y a AUCUNE variation de la masse (no mass variation).
>
>  m'=m
>
>  La notion de "time dilation" est imprécise:
>  t'=t(1+cosµ.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo^2/c^2)
>
>  La notion de "lenth contraction" aussi:
>  l'=l.sqrt(1-Vo^2/c^2)/(1+Cosµ.Vo/c)
>
>   Quant à la variation de l'impulsion, c'est bon, mais mal écrit.
>   Il faut écrire:
>   p = m. [Vo/sqrt(1-Vo^2/c^2)]       with independant m.
>
>
>   Mais bon, il parait que d'après ce qu'il paraitrait, je suis nul en RR.
>
>   Mort de rire....   :))
>
>
>   R.H.

You are talking to a troll of lowest species. You will not get anyehere
with "Automated Sharma"

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1168706171.703979.278150@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<1168608887.104177.293060@i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1168614617.808260.204340@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1168616988.501624.43970@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <MuZph.225$u8.3@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1168696953.817598.214090@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <45A8F885.160A4095@tiscali.fr>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dcf57fa2a8523cf9
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dcf57fa2a8523cf9
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dcf57fa2a8523cf9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,public
X-Google-Language: FRENCH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: karandash2000@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique
Subject: Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
Date: 13 Jan 2007 08:36:13 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <1168706171.703979.278150@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
References: <1168608887.104177.293060@i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1168614617.808260.204340@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
   <1168616988.501624.43970@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <MuZph.225$u8.3@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
   <1168696953.817598.214090@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
   <45A8F885.160A4095@tiscali.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.170.234.213
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1168706180 17937 127.0.0.1 (13 Jan 2007 16:36:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:36:20 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <45A8F885.160A4095@tiscali.fr>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.170.234.213;
   posting-account=3tLXaQ0AAABbjRCHFo0WYZUixC8BIz3W

Reply to Parent Message