Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?

Article View: sci.physics.relativity

Article #7463

Back to sci.physics.relativity Previous Next

#7463

From: Bill Hobba
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:46

37 lines
2515 bytes

"sciencecool@yahoo.co.uk" <sciencecool@sify.com> wrote in message 
news:1168616988.501624.43970@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> To decide this issue , one has to be rational with open mind.
> It is evident, and Einstein too accepted in 1907 , that he has
> collected and interpretted in NEW WAY.
>
> The relativistc variation of mass, time dilation, length contraction
> were existing before Einstein.
> Einstein simply used  then in his June 1905 paper,

He did not.  He derived them is a new and different way.

> without
> acknowledging the work of the scientists who have put forth such ideas
> before Einstein.
> Also Editor of the Annalen de Physik , did not point out.
>
> Even Born has said that Einstein should have given references of the
> existing work.
> Thus every human have limitations.

Sure - but he was no plagiarist.

>
> To publish papers like this , in today's context, it is impossible.
>

Wrong.

Bill

>
> AJAY SHARMA
> www.ajayonline.us
>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <MuZph.225$u8.3@news-server.bigpond.net.au>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!ken-spool.news.telstra.net!ken-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail

References:

<1168608887.104177.293060@i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>   <1168614617.808260.204340@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1168616988.501624.43970@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dcf57fa2a8523cf9
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dcf57fa2a8523cf9
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dcf57fa2a8523cf9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!ken-spool.news.telstra.net!ken-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Bill Hobba" <rubbish@junk.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique
References: <1168608887.104177.293060@i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>   <1168614617.808260.204340@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1168616988.501624.43970@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
Lines: 39
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000702-1, 01/11/2007), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID: <MuZph.225$u8.3@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:46:36 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 60.228.93.75
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1168663596 60.228.93.75 (Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:46:36 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:46:36 EST
Organization: BigPond Internet Services

Reply to Parent Message