🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7464

Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?

#7464
From: Koobee Wublee
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:01
112 lines
4994 bytes
Eric Gisse wrote:
> Koobee Wublee wrote:

> > Physicists still believe in absolute silly things such as
> >
> > **  Principle of Relativity which has been proven false by
> > Hafele-Keating experiment, GPS, and more.
>
> None of which are in SR's domain of application. Congratulations on
> continuing to be stupid.

Some of them are.  You are being ignorant again.

> > **  Goedesics follow the path with the maximum amount of accumulated
> > spacetime.
>
> Whatever that means.

Study.

> What is maximized is actually proper time.

That is exactly the stupid sh*t the physicists believe in right now.
It makes no sense.  Because for a photon, the spacetime is zero, there
is no maximum in spacetime to a photon.  That means light cannot travel
in space according to you.

> > **  SR does not manifest the twin's paradox.
>
> In that it isn't a paradox or that you are too stupid to see how the
> apparent paradox comes up?

Where have you been?

> > **  ds^2 = g_ij dq^i dq^j = f(dq, dq)
> >
> >       g_ij = f()
>
> Yes, Riemannian geometry is _silly_.

You can say that again.

> > **  All solutions to the field equations where the equations are only
> > valid with one specific choice of coordinate system suddenly represent
> > a unified solution with each solution associated with each possible
> > choice of coordinate system.
>
> A complaint made manifest by your inability to understand tensors.

No, it is in the very simple mathematics.

> > **  GPS proves GR and/or SR where some certain crackpots may not agree
> > that GPS does prove SR.
>
> GPS has nothing to do with SR. What are you even ranting about anyway?

Except the synchronization part of the satellites in different orbits.

> These "problems" make you seem delusional.

No, I understand the problem crystal clear.  I even pointed out the
garbage of what you believe in in the past.

> > **  Field equations were derived while Einstein fancying himself in
> > free fall.
>
> ....huh?

Don't understand?  Re-read then.  <shrug>

> > **  Einstein Equivalence Principle is the most power of them all
> > despite it serves no real purpose.  Galileo's principle of
> > equivalence paved the way for Newton's law of gravity.
>
> Of course it serves no real purpose in your mind - you haven't actually
> studied the theory and seen where it is used.

Yes, I have.  You have not even tried to understand it.  It is like the
calculus of variations thing, eh?

> > **  The math-illiterate, Einstein, himself can come up with the math of
> > the field equations.
>
> ...classic.
>
> You really think Albert Einstein, who had a PhD in physics, was
> math-illiterate?

Absolutely.  Look at the 9th one in the following link.

http://www.empyrean.ca/words/quotes/einstein.html

> > **  ...
> >
> > And the most absurd of it all.
> >
> > **  The curvature in spacetime is caused by energy where energy is an
> > observed phenomenon.
>
> So basically you think everything about GR is absurd, from the
> foundations of differential geometry to the field equations.

Absolutely.

> > Arguing for any of the points above would make the discussion about
> > (Einstein = God) more serious.
>
> Yes, arguing about KW's delusions makes another delusion more serious.

I am not delusional.  If so, you with a blank mind would not be such
angry.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1168675263.579611.302750@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1168608887.104177.293060@i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1168614617.808260.204340@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1168628267.272940.111510@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> <1168641497.084309.305620@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> <1168645106.629191.20110@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dcf57fa2a8523cf9
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dcf57fa2a8523cf9
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dcf57fa2a8523cf9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Koobee Wublee" <koobee.wublee@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique
Subject: Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
Date: 13 Jan 2007 00:01:03 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 113
Message-ID: <1168675263.579611.302750@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <1168608887.104177.293060@i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1168614617.808260.204340@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
   <1168628267.272940.111510@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com>
   <1168641497.084309.305620@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com>
   <1168645106.629191.20110@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.229.36.220
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1168675272 3875 127.0.0.1 (13 Jan 2007 08:01:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:01:12 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1168645106.629191.20110@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; InfoPath.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.229.36.220;
   posting-account=qH5b2g0AAADxdyyR4If1Q7TLaSxErZPT