Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7490Re: The Simplest Genuine Refutation of Special Relativity
From: Daryl McCullough
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:33
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:33
27 lines
2308 bytes
2308 bytes
Wolfgang G. Gasser says... >Let us assume a relative speed of v = 0.99995 c (with gamma = 100) >of each observer with respect to the other. Deviation from inertial >motion can be made as small as we like by choosing a large enough >radius of the orbit in relation to the height of the light clock. If the clocks are in circular orbits, then deviation from inertial motion is *not* negligible. What you mean is that you can make the acceleration negligible by choosing a large enough radius. But the effect of noninertiality in relativity is *not* proportional to the magnitude of the acceleration. Are you assuming that the clocks are held in orbit by gravity, or perhaps by a long string? If it involves gravity, then the problem needs to be solved using General Relativity. If they are held together by a long string (or by carefully aimed rockets), then best way to analyze this particular situation is to use the inertial reference frame of the center of the orbit. What is *not* legitimate is to use the Lorentz transformations, because those are only valid for transformations between inertial coordinate systems. -- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<enlnkg011kv@drn.newsguy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!63.218.45.11!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!64.209.4.19.MISMATCH!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drnReferences:
<ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <enjf3m$q39$1@atlas.ip-plus.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!63.218.45.11!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!64.209.4.19.MISMATCH!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn From: stevendaryl3016@yahoo.com (Daryl McCullough) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: The Simplest Genuine Refutation of Special Relativity Date: 5 Jan 2007 06:33:52 -0800 Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95 Lines: 28 Message-ID: <enlnkg011kv@drn.newsguy.com> References: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <enjf3m$q39$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: news@newsdawg.com User-Agent: Direct Read News 4.70