Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity

Article View: sci.physics.relativity

Article #7508

Back to sci.physics.relativity Previous Next

#7508

From: Mike
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:47

59 lines
3327 bytes

Eric Gisse wrote:
> Mike wrote:
> > karandash2000@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > Henri Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > So the GPS clocks that you claim prove SR correct move in straight lines do
> > > > they Snipper?
> > > >
> > >
> > > To your great disappointment, "dr. Henri", GPS proves BOTH SR AND GR
> > > correct. Without the SR/GR adjustments, your car would turn into the
> > > city garbage dump instead of taking you to your home for the Alzheimer
> > > retards. Which would be the appropriate thing (in your case).
> >
> >
> > Even if SR/GR was never invented it would be a trivial engineering task
> > to determine the upfront correction to the clocks before sending them
> > to orbit so that the receivers will operate at a given accuracy level.
>
> Really? Show us.
>
> >
> > It turns out the correction is just a constant. Are you so stupid after
> > all?
>
> Incorrect, as usual.
>
> The correction is not a constant.

As usual? Let us see who is incorrect big way as usual? How would you
know egghead if the correction is a constant or not? Did you solve any
equations of motion? How is that possible since you do not even know
what is going on even in Newtonian Mechanics as it is proven in the
post below where you confuse with free fall equation with an Euler ODE:

http://groups.google.gr/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/01b8793b2b1f235b?&hl=en

In your place I would shut up egg_phok_head.

Mike





>
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > 
> > > http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-1/

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1167817679.202737.197120@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com> <1167780307.600307.68300@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1167783484.368323.272830@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1167793828.218058.258440@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique
Subject: Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
Date: 3 Jan 2007 01:47:59 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <1167817679.202737.197120@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com>
References: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net>
   <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>
   <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com>
   <1167780307.600307.68300@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <1167783484.368323.272830@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1167793828.218058.258440@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.203.152.52
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1167817685 2914 127.0.0.1 (3 Jan 2007 09:48:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 09:48:05 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1167793828.218058.258440@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.203.152.52;
   posting-account=u3EDPg0AAADaLcRunJk5L0Cw4LDDaXak

Reply to Parent Message