Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7519Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
From: karandash2000
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:58
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:58
41 lines
2946 bytes
2946 bytes
Mike wrote: > karandash2000@yahoo.com wrote: > > Henri Wilson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > So the GPS clocks that you claim prove SR correct move in straight lines do > > > they Snipper? > > > > > > > To your great disappointment, "dr. Henri", GPS proves BOTH SR AND GR > > correct.... > > Hello crank. No axiomatic formal theory can be proved, only > corroborated by testing. You got your answer by Tom Roberts: > > http://groups.google.gr/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/bde079cfc636dcd4?&hl=en > > I wonder where is Crank Alert. He is gone and cranks like you are > having a ball shiting all over the place. > > Mike Of course, you "got me" . Finally. By riding Tom's coattails. For once you agree with him. If I were you, I would be worried about this immortal fumble: > > Even if SR/GR was never invented it would be a trivial engineering task > > to determine the upfront correction to the clocks before sending them > > to orbit so that the receivers will operate at a given accuracy level. >> Mike "le petit cretin", on Jan 2 Show us , drolly-trolly How do you calculate your now famous "constant correction" w/o SR/GR? Start "calculating" you are so much more fun when you pretend to be a "scientist"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1167861496.310870.323960@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com> <1167780307.600307.68300@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1167839582.537681.324500@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: karandash2000@yahoo.com Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity Date: 3 Jan 2007 13:58:16 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 42 Message-ID: <1167861496.310870.323960@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> References: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com> <1167780307.600307.68300@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1167839582.537681.324500@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.36.122.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1167861501 26052 127.0.0.1 (3 Jan 2007 21:58:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 21:58:21 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1167839582.537681.324500@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.36.122.2; posting-account=3tLXaQ0AAABbjRCHFo0WYZUixC8BIz3W