Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7520Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
From: Eric Gisse
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:16
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:16
72 lines
3912 bytes
3912 bytes
Mike wrote: > Eric Gisse wrote: > > Mike wrote: > > > karandash2000@yahoo.com wrote: > > > > Henri Wilson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the GPS clocks that you claim prove SR correct move in straight lines do > > > > > they Snipper? > > > > > > > > > > > > > To your great disappointment, "dr. Henri", GPS proves BOTH SR AND GR > > > > correct. Without the SR/GR adjustments, your car would turn into the > > > > city garbage dump instead of taking you to your home for the Alzheimer > > > > retards. Which would be the appropriate thing (in your case). > > > > > > > > > Even if SR/GR was never invented it would be a trivial engineering task > > > to determine the upfront correction to the clocks before sending them > > > to orbit so that the receivers will operate at a given accuracy level. > > > > Really? Show us. > > > > > > > > It turns out the correction is just a constant. Are you so stupid after > > > all? > > > > Incorrect, as usual. > > > > The correction is not a constant. > > As usual? Let us see who is incorrect big way as usual? How would you > know egghead if the correction is a constant or not? Did you solve any > equations of motion? How is that possible since you do not even know > what is going on even in Newtonian Mechanics as it is proven in the > post below where you confuse with free fall equation with an Euler ODE: > > http://groups.google.gr/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/01b8793b2b1f235b?&hl=en > > In your place I would shut up egg_phok_head. Wonder twin powers activate....form of INTELLECUAL DISHONESTY! I already admitted I fucked up, and made up for it by solving the problem in a later post. Do you wish to critique my solution, or would you rather whine impotently? Why don't we talk about you education, Mike? In what subjects did you obtain two masters and two doctorates, as you claim you have? > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-1/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1167862590.041556.70330@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com> <1167780307.600307.68300@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1167783484.368323.272830@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1167793828.218058.258440@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1167817679.202737.197120@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity Date: 3 Jan 2007 14:16:30 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 73 Message-ID: <1167862590.041556.70330@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> References: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com> <1167780307.600307.68300@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1167783484.368323.272830@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1167793828.218058.258440@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1167817679.202737.197120@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.229.60.199 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1167862595 12391 127.0.0.1 (3 Jan 2007 22:16:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:16:35 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1167817679.202737.197120@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.229.60.199; posting-account=UNURcQ0AAAB0KjBkwWh67aNCwtznJjSP