Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #927Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON
From: PD
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:25
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:25
25 lines
2472 bytes
2472 bytes
On Dec 10, 3:23 pm, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 10, 12:57 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Again: Clever Draper, is the speed of light unaffected/affected by the > > movements of the observer according to Maxwell's electromagnetic > > theory? > > Unaffected, according to Maxwell's equations, with the extra baggage > of the ether dropped and the principle of relativity included. > > This turns out to be completely consistent with scores of experiments > measuring two-way light speed and one-way and two-way isotropy. > > PD Moreover, if the speed of light were affected by the movements of the observer by ANY theory (let alone Maxwell's), then this would be inconsistent with scores of experiments measuring two-way light speed and one-way and two-way isotropy. I certainly hope this answers your question, clever Pentcho. PD
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7b4302d3-8346-4218-ba8d-615b106761dd@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4B1FDD30.82B80BA8@hate.spam.net> <3cb93234-aa3a-4f80-8c93-b1c5c9df9f04@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <902e99a8-f4b2-4762-84db-69096a9e7983@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,dc700a8560c18dd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: PD <thedraperfamily@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique Subject: Re: EINSTEIN AGAINST MAXWELL AND NEWTON Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:25:08 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 25 Message-ID: <7b4302d3-8346-4218-ba8d-615b106761dd@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> References: <65b3aa2f-33ac-4f6c-81ba-857920f6e7e2@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4B1FDD30.82B80BA8@hate.spam.net> <3cb93234-aa3a-4f80-8c93-b1c5c9df9f04@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <902e99a8-f4b2-4762-84db-69096a9e7983@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.208.104.19 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1260480308 7294 127.0.0.1 (10 Dec 2009 21:25:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=206.208.104.19; posting-account=nPH_PQkAAACneDKT6RXopPWArC2We4Rq User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox 66960903 [xSP_2:29697434dd0768330b2c9bd72f24b458_249] (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)