🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #979

Re: WHY EINSTEIN STILL RULES

#979
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:15
93 lines
6519 bytes
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7271/full/462291a.html
NATURE: "Burst of support for relativity. Light from a distant gamma-
ray burst backs up a key prediction of Albert Einstein's theory of
relativity — that photon speed is the same regardless of energy."

1. Observations suggest that high-energy photons travel through space
slower than low-energy photons.

2. Einsteinians (Lee Smolin and brothers in this case) advance
theories predicting that that high-energy photons travel slower than
low-energy photons. Career, money etc.

3. A single observation suggests that high-energy photons travel
through space slower than low-energy photons but the difference in
speed is small.

4. Einsteinians (Lee Smolin and brothers again) discover "a key
prediction of Albert Einstein's theory of relativity — that photon
speed is the same regardless of energy".

5. Einsteinians (Lee Smolin and brothers again) make a second
discovery: the single observation confirms the "key prediction of
Albert Einstein's theory of relativity" and therefore there is "burst
of support for relativity" in the world.

6. The journal Nature immediately publishes Lee Smolin and brothers'
discoveries. Career, money etc. for Nature editors, Lee Smolin,
brothers and sycophants.

Pentcho Valev wrote:

In Einsteiniana:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327246.800-13-more-things-magic-results.html
"In 2005, researchers at the MAGIC gamma-ray telescope on La Palma in
the Canary Islands were studying gamma-ray bursts emitted by the black
hole in the centre of the Markarian 501 galaxy, half a billion light
years away. The burst's high-energy gamma rays arrived at the
telescope 4 minutes later than the lower-energy rays. Both parts of
the spectrum should have been emitted at the same time. So is the time
lag due to the high-energy radiation travelling slower through space?
That wouldn't make sense: it would contravene one of the central
tenets of special relativity. According to Einstein, all
electromagnetic radiation always travels through vacuum at the cosmic
speed limit the speed of light. The energy of the radiation should be
absolutely irrelevant."

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/11/04/gamma-rays-einstein.html
"At stake was nothing less than a foundation of modern physics --
Einstein's theory of relativity, which posits that all electromagnetic
radiation travels at the same speed, whether low-energy radio waves,
high-energy X-rays or gamma rays, or any wavelength in between. (...)
After a journey of more than 7 billion light-years, however, the gamma
ray photons arrived nine-tenths of a second apart on May 9, 2009 --
not enough of a lag to account for the theorized quantum effects.
"Einstein, at this point, wins again," Michelson said."

http://live.psu.edu/story/42610
"Of the many gamma-ray photons detected by Fermi from the 2.1-second
burst, two had energies differing by a million times. Yet after
traveling some seven billion years, the pair of photons arrived just
nine-tenths of a second apart. "This measurement eliminates any
approach to a new theory of gravity that predicts a strong energy-
dependent change in the speed of light," Michelson said. The long-
distance experiment showed that "To one part in 100 million billion,
these two photons traveled at the same speed. "EINSTEIN STILL RULES,"
Michelson said."

In Big Brother's world:

http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984/
George Orwell: "In the end the Party would announce that two and two
made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that
they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their
position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the
very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their
philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was
terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise,
but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two
and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the
past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist
only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable what then?"

Breathtaking news in Big Brother's world: In 2005, researchers at the
MAGIC gamma-ray telescope on La Palma in the Canary Islands added two
and two and did not get five, but then Stanford University's Peter
Michelson, the lead scientist on the Fermi Large Area Telescope, added
two and two again and did not get five either. "BIG BROTHER STILL
RULES," Michelson said.

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ab96d967-9325-4411-bf62-d8e830fc27bd@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <81bbb508-c599-4c38-ab37-18fe5c85743c@a31g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <pan.2009.11.05.10.00.15@canonicalscience.com> <451659ca-0065-4936-9507-eee802ca6436@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <aa4ec5e3-731b-4c77-9572-f43fa1d15ccf@g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <35eb2f4b-ba94-4c02-aff7-867c408aff11@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <3c34238e-0361-4fc8-bbb6-5554b0cad539@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4AF9B37D.D135871E@hate.spam.net> <27455211-f680-4fb5-8dd4-604278432754@u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <9b24c474-d1e9-4e0a-ac2a-0580ac8db7be@w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <5128e902-bfd9-4af1-b930-740390fe9f42@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,2eeaf39e9c1fbfae
X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Subject: Re: WHY EINSTEIN STILL RULES
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:15:47 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 93
Message-ID: <ab96d967-9325-4411-bf62-d8e830fc27bd@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: <81bbb508-c599-4c38-ab37-18fe5c85743c@a31g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> 
 <pan.2009.11.05.10.00.15@canonicalscience.com> <451659ca-0065-4936-9507-eee802ca6436@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <aa4ec5e3-731b-4c77-9572-f43fa1d15ccf@g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <35eb2f4b-ba94-4c02-aff7-867c408aff11@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <3c34238e-0361-4fc8-bbb6-5554b0cad539@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
 <4AF9B37D.D135871E@hate.spam.net> <27455211-f680-4fb5-8dd4-604278432754@u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <9b24c474-d1e9-4e0a-ac2a-0580ac8db7be@w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <5128e902-bfd9-4af1-b930-740390fe9f42@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.215.201.46
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1258643748 14217 127.0.0.1 (19 Nov 2009 15:15:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:15:48 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.215.201.46; 
 posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; 
 AskTB5.5),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)