Article View: sci.physics
Article #10991Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
From: rbwinn
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:25
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:25
60 lines
4896 bytes
4896 bytes
On Aug 6, 2:42�am, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote: > On Aug 6, 2:41 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 5, 7:56 pm, ben_dolan_...@reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote: > > > > DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote: > > > > > William Jennings Bryan claimed to be an expert on the Bible. He was > > > > > unable to answer Clarence Darrow's questions about the Bible. > > > > > So, it didn't have anything to do with the truthfulness of the Bible > > > > itself. It could've just as easily been the Lord of the Rings or > > > > Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. It could've easily been a frikkin' > > > > Mickey Mouse cartoon. > > > > > It has nothing to do with the truthfulness of the content. It had to do > > > > with the expertise of the witness. > > > > Well, perhaps the child does not understand that Bryan was the > > > prosecutor of the case, and Darrow the defense lawyer. So Bryan's > > > inability to defend the Bible's truthfulness really was to expose the > > > book for what it is, a collection of ancient fairy tales and > > > superstitions. > > > > As Darrow put it so succinctly, "We have the purpose of preventing > > > bigots and ignoramuses from controlling the education of the United > > > States", a lesson that had to be relearned a few short years ago in a > > > Pennsylvania courtroom. > > > > The Winn child, here in this newsgroup, clearly hasn't learned that > > > lesson yet... > > > The reason why I used this example of the Bible being used as evidence > > in court, Satan, was because I knew that no atheist would deny that > > Clarence Darrow introduced the Bible into evidence in court and cross- > > examined William Jennings Bryan about the Bible. > > Robert B. Winn > > So, next time we shall use the Harry Potter book as evidence in court? > You must somehow got twisted in your mind or you lied. > The bible was a collection of ancient tales, how could it be an > evidence in modern court? > Of course, unless it was used as a weapon which carried blood or > finger print......but then, the content/story would not be used at > all. Otherwise, please do inform us how it could be of use as an > evidence.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Sorry, hhyaps, it already happened. Clarence Darrow entered the Bible as evidence in the Scopes trial and cross-examined the prosecutor, William Jennings Bryan about it. Robert B. Winn
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<fdc17f86-c4fd-4799-b73d-cafd08f2bcfa@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<d8a3974b-487c-48ec-9115-348b9e2c1a29@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <867b5a03-ffe7-49b7-9e74-842cc449d2f2@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <YMCdnUrRXpJ94AvVnZ2dnUVZ_ozinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <df36fbb3-4bc6-4217-93a7-eb8537d50404@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1il524t.13tmk691xj9wjmN%ben_dolan_III@reet.com> <2e369a5a-28f1-4a0f-b978-c3749d522e81@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <_OydnQiBG9AAQArVnZ2dnUVZ_q3inZ2d@speakeasy.net> <6d3eb908-e83d-43aa-b95b-8e36cde72af3@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com> <UvOdnQ_A45bSxAXVnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <9f038a44-a1ef-4033-9682-16a00ef40206@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <SrqdnY1f7uhokATVnZ2dnUVZ_v_inZ2d@speakeasy.net> <1il7tf6.1mdymas1ba79ibN%ben_dolan_III@reet.com> <d6c16251-6c5c-4753-bb4d-2bb7aea10bb0@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <781f330a-c6ec-4f37-a25c-28285ab5fed5@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,dac8026861d35fee X-Google-Thread: f442a,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 116469,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid102f53,gidf442a,gid116469,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,cam.misc,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism Subject: Re: Does God need to prove He exists? Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 60 Message-ID: <fdc17f86-c4fd-4799-b73d-cafd08f2bcfa@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> References: <d8a3974b-487c-48ec-9115-348b9e2c1a29@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <867b5a03-ffe7-49b7-9e74-842cc449d2f2@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <YMCdnUrRXpJ94AvVnZ2dnUVZ_ozinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <df36fbb3-4bc6-4217-93a7-eb8537d50404@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1il524t.13tmk691xj9wjmN%ben_dolan_III@reet.com> <2e369a5a-28f1-4a0f-b978-c3749d522e81@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <_OydnQiBG9AAQArVnZ2dnUVZ_q3inZ2d@speakeasy.net> <6d3eb908-e83d-43aa-b95b-8e36cde72af3@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com> <UvOdnQ_A45bSxAXVnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <9f038a44-a1ef-4033-9682-16a00ef40206@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <SrqdnY1f7uhokATVnZ2dnUVZ_v_inZ2d@speakeasy.net> <1il7tf6.1mdymas1ba79ibN%ben_dolan_III@reet.com> <d6c16251-6c5c-4753-bb4d-2bb7aea10bb0@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <781f330a-c6ec-4f37-a25c-28285ab5fed5@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.12.117.9 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1218047133 23612 127.0.0.1 (6 Aug 2008 18:25:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.12.117.9; posting-account=i6vpvwoAAABRbNds_JrzhNT-NaeHIrDG User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.1; AOLBuild 4334.36; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.1.5 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 spider-mtc-th10.proxy.aol.com[400C70EA] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1 cache-mtc-ae05.proxy.aol.com[400C7509] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])