Article View: sci.physics
Article #10994Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
From: rbwinn
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:31
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:31
44 lines
4349 bytes
4349 bytes
On Aug 6, 3:32�am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Aug 5, 7:35 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote: > >> rbwinn wrote: > >>> On Aug 5, 6:44 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote: > >>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>> On Aug 4, 9:57 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote: > >>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > >>>>>>> On Aug 4, 8:00 am, ben_dolan_...@reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote: > >>>>>>>> rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> For any kind of case. A lawyer can request that a Bible be entered as > >>>>>>>>> evidence in any court case. > >>>>>>>> No, actually he can't. Where the fuck do you come up with such utter > >>>>>>>> bullshit? > >>>>>>>> Fuckin' moron. > >>>>>>> Clarence Darrow did it. Don't you remember anything, Satan? > >>>>>> And what did he use it as evidence of...? > >>>>> He used it as evidence that William Jennings Bryan did not know what > >>>>> he was talking about. > >>>> Okay. Did they use the evidence to show proof that the Bible was > >>>> fact...or that Bryan just didn't know what he was talking about? > >>> William Jennings Bryan claimed to be an expert on the Bible. He was > >>> unable to answer Clarence Darrow's questions about the Bible. > >> So, it didn't have anything to do with the truthfulness of the Bible > >> itself. It could've just as easily been the Lord of the Rings or > >> Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. It could've easily been a frikkin' > >> Mickey Mouse cartoon. > > >> It has nothing to do with the truthfulness of the content. It had to do > >> with the expertise of the witness. > > > No, Clarence Darrow wanted William Jennings Bryan portrayed as the > > most knowledgable man on earth with respect to the Bible. > > Which is irrelevant to the truthfulness of the Bible. > That is true. William Jennings Bryan was not very knowledgable about the Bible. Robert B. Winn
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0f8c2b0f-7ba1-4e9d-a02b-85d58e7dc1ea@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<ueOdnfrcNJSl1gzVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <3qfc94h9brm81jfppngjd7dk34boc5jk2r@4ax.com> <867b5a03-ffe7-49b7-9e74-842cc449d2f2@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <YMCdnUrRXpJ94AvVnZ2dnUVZ_ozinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <df36fbb3-4bc6-4217-93a7-eb8537d50404@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1il524t.13tmk691xj9wjmN%ben_dolan_III@reet.com> <2e369a5a-28f1-4a0f-b978-c3749d522e81@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <_OydnQiBG9AAQArVnZ2dnUVZ_q3inZ2d@speakeasy.net> <6d3eb908-e83d-43aa-b95b-8e36cde72af3@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com> <UvOdnQ_A45bSxAXVnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <9f038a44-a1ef-4033-9682-16a00ef40206@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <SrqdnY1f7uhokATVnZ2dnUVZ_v_inZ2d@speakeasy.net> <cb1fc31a-e041-4fc9-b3ef-55088bfbaf40@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <d8udnedA0ehe4ATVnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@speakeasy.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,dac8026861d35fee X-Google-Thread: f442a,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 116469,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid102f53,gidf442a,gid116469,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,cam.misc,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism Subject: Re: Does God need to prove He exists? Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 44 Message-ID: <0f8c2b0f-7ba1-4e9d-a02b-85d58e7dc1ea@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> References: <ueOdnfrcNJSl1gzVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <3qfc94h9brm81jfppngjd7dk34boc5jk2r@4ax.com> <867b5a03-ffe7-49b7-9e74-842cc449d2f2@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <YMCdnUrRXpJ94AvVnZ2dnUVZ_ozinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <df36fbb3-4bc6-4217-93a7-eb8537d50404@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1il524t.13tmk691xj9wjmN%ben_dolan_III@reet.com> <2e369a5a-28f1-4a0f-b978-c3749d522e81@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <_OydnQiBG9AAQArVnZ2dnUVZ_q3inZ2d@speakeasy.net> <6d3eb908-e83d-43aa-b95b-8e36cde72af3@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com> <UvOdnQ_A45bSxAXVnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <9f038a44-a1ef-4033-9682-16a00ef40206@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <SrqdnY1f7uhokATVnZ2dnUVZ_v_inZ2d@speakeasy.net> <cb1fc31a-e041-4fc9-b3ef-55088bfbaf40@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <d8udnedA0ehe4ATVnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@speakeasy.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.12.117.9 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1218047498 14815 127.0.0.1 (6 Aug 2008 18:31:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.12.117.9; posting-account=i6vpvwoAAABRbNds_JrzhNT-NaeHIrDG User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.1; AOLBuild 4334.36; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.1.5 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 spider-mtc-th10.proxy.aol.com[400C70EA] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1 cache-mtc-ae05.proxy.aol.com[400C7509] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])