🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 6, 1:50�am, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
<alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 4:29 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 5, 7:47 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>
> > > rbwinn wrote:
> > > > On Aug 5, 6:50 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > > >> rbwinn wrote:
> > > >>> On Aug 4, 10:10 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > > >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Aug 4, 8:35 pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On Aug 4, 8:02 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:56 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 4:29 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> > > >>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:12?am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up your claim.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a Bible. ?There's no evidence in there to back up your claim.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> them, Peace be unto you.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> John 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> caught.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> many, yet was not the net broken.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the disciples durst
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 13 Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> likewise.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 14 This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> The Bible still is not evidence. I asked for evidence.- Hide quoted text -
> > > >>>>>>>>> The Bible is accepted as evidence in court.
> > > >>>>>>>> For what kinds of cases?
> > > >>>>>>> For any kind of case. A lawyer can request that a Bible be entered as
> > > >>>>>>> evidence in any court case. Clarence Darrow had the Bible entered as
> > > >>>>>>> evidence in the famous "monkey trial".
> > > >>>>>>> Riobert B. Winn
> > > >>>>>> A judge must be mad or loony if he were to allow for bible as
> > > >>>>>> evidence.
> > > >>>>>> You mean that ancient time recording can be the evidence for modern
> > > >>>>>> time crime or cases?
> > > >>>>>> This would also mean America is declining, at a rate faster than I
> > > >>>>>> thought.- Hide quoted text -
> > > >>>>> Well, it happened in 1934, or whenever it was. So we have that
> > > >>>>> precedent in American jurisprudence.
> > > >>>> In only one type of trial, if it happened at all. Your credibility is
> > > >>>> nil at this point.
> > > >>> Well, judges of today are very careful to make certain that only
> > > >>> atheism is allowed in courtrooms.
> > > >> You mean, they'll only allow secular evidence?
>
> > > >>> That does not mean that the Bible
> > > >>> is not evidence. No matter how hard atheists try, they are unable to
> > > >>> make the Bible disappear. That is why it is evidence.
> > > >> Atheists are not trying to make the Bible disappear.
>
> > > >> It also isn't evidence, no matter hard you try to make it evidence.
>
> > > >> --
>
> > > > So you are saying that the Bible is like Hezekiah's tunnel, it does
> > > > not exist.
>
> > > Um. No.
>
> > � If the Bible exists, then it is evidence. �So does it exist or not?
> > Robert B. Winn
>
> Yes, several of them exist. �Several Harry Potter books exist too.
> What was your point here anyway?
>

If you want to talk about Harry Potter books, we can talk about Harry
Potter books, Al.  Do you believe that Harry Potter is going to save
you?
Robert B. Winn