🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 6, 1:28�am, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>
> news:256a94a9-8283-4a9e-873c-a47bf89b6198@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 5, 1:46 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:558164f1-39f1-48fe-9b6f-90c711472882@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> I will say it. You have serious mental disturbances. But that is as
> >> >> far as it goes. I am not a psychiatrist so I cannot prescribe you
> >> >> medications or enforce any institutionalisations. I think you would
> >> >> benefit from both, but as an uneducated opinion, it holds no weight.
> >> >> You have tried to get people to say they would like to lock you up on
> >> >> several occaissions. Why is that?
>
> >> >> Al- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > Because it is true. If you were able to do it, that is what you would
> >> > do. However, I know more about the atheistic court system than you do
> >> > and would be able to stop it from happening. Secondly, if it did
> >> > happen, all I would have to do is talk to a psychiatrist, and I would
> >> > be released.
> >> > The reason I know so much about it is because I have already been
> >> > declared insane and institutionalized. It is just a system of
> >> > accusation in which no proof is required. All it takes are the
> >> > signatures of a judge and two medical doctors.
> >> > Robert B. Winn
>
> >> In any court, expert medical opinion is classed as valid evidence or
> >> proof..
> >> Sorry.
>
> >> --
> >> Steve O
>
> > Well, here in the United States, defendants were supposed to have the
> > right to defend themselves.
>
> As far as I am aware they still do.
> I expect you are referring to your own personal experiences in court, and I
> assume that it didn't go the way YOU planned.
> Maybe you feel hard done by, which might explain your outrageous and
> incorrect claim that defendants in the US don't have the right to defend
> themselves...
> If , as you claim ,you were denied that right, then all you would have to do
> is produce three qualified doctors in court to counter- testify against the
> three who were trying to commit you, and your rights would not have been
> violated.
> I expect you were unable to do that
>
> >I do not think you are sorry at all. �You atheists found a way to take away
> >all rights of United States citizens
> > by just getting signatures from three corrupt individuals.
> > Robert B. Winn
>
> That's an incredible claim, but I suspect it has more to do with your
> delusional condition rather than reality or court procedure.
> Maybe you should talk to your doctor about that.
> The fact remains - expert medical opinion is regarded as evidence in court.
> You were committed to a mental health institution on the strength of that
> expert opinion, for which there clearly must have been plenty of evidence -
> you've certainly shown evidence of you mental ill- health here in this
> forum.
>
> --
The only evidence the doctors presented was that I refused to speak
with either doctor before the hearing.   I was committed to a mental
health institution because two doctors and a judge were angry with me
because they felt I was not showing them the proper respect.  A person
accused of insanity has no means of getting other doctors to testify
in their behalf, expecially not if they are being held in jail as I
was.
Robert B. Winn