🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 5, 7:32�pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Aug 5, 6:31 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Aug 4, 9:22 pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> On Aug 5, 11:08 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 4, 5:34 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 05:02:25 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism
> >>>>>> rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> >>>>>> <df36fbb3-4bc6-4217-93a7-eb8537d50...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>:
> >>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:56?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 4:29 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:12?am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up your claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a Bible. ?There's no evidence in there to back up your claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>> John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the
> >>>>>>>>>>> week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for
> >>>>>>>>>>> fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto
> >>>>>>>>>>> them, Peace be unto you.
> >>>>>>>>>>> John 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of
> >>>>>>>>>>> coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now
> >>>>>>>>>>> caught.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great
> >>>>>>>>>>> fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so
> >>>>>>>>>>> many, yet was not the net broken.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the disciples durst
> >>>>>>>>>>> ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 13 Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish
> >>>>>>>>>>> likewise.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 14 This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his
> >>>>>>>>>>> disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
> >>>>>>>>>> The Bible still is not evidence. I asked for evidence.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>> The Bible is accepted as evidence in court. ?
> >>>>>>>> For what kinds of cases?
> >>>>>>> For any kind of case. A lawyer can request that a Bible be entered as
> >>>>>>> evidence in any court case. Clarence Darrow had the Bible entered as
> >>>>>>> evidence in the famous "monkey trial".
> >>>>>> When did you last check the rules of evidence?- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>> The last time I was in court. I attempted to introduce the
> >>>>> Constitution of the United States as evidence.
> >>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>> Yes, the constitution was written in modern time and is not a story.
> >>>> The bible was written more than 2000 years ago and was a collection of
> >>>> tales meant to con the young into sleep.
> >>>> You do not know the significance of a constitution and a fictional
> >>>> story book.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>> I said I attempted to enter the Constitution as evidence. Judges in
> >>> America today do not allow the Constitution in their police state
> >>> courts.
> >> Just like they do not allow independent voters to run for public office,
> >> right? I demolished that claim. Want me to demolish this one? All I
> >> need to do is to find ONE case wherein the Constitution was used as
> >> evidence.
>
> >> Want me to do that?
>
> > You did not demolish anything. �Independent voters are prevented from
> > running for office every way party politicians can think of to prevent
> > them from running.
> > That is just a fact.
>
> And, as I showed, that's NOT a fact. �It's a downright, bald-faced lie.
> � The existence of Bernie Sanders demolishes your claim.
>
> > As for the other matter, you would have to find a case where a police
> > state judge allowed a defendant to refer to the Constitution or
> > Constitutional rights.
>
> Want me to do that?
>
Bernie Sanders is not an independent voter.  He is a political party
member just as Joseph Lieberman is a party member.
Robert B. Winn