🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 5, 7:47�pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Aug 5, 6:50 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Aug 4, 10:10 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 4, 8:35 pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>> On Aug 4, 8:02 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:56 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 4:29 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:12?am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up your claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a Bible. ?There's no evidence in there to back up your claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>> John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the
> >>>>>>>>>>> week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for
> >>>>>>>>>>> fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto
> >>>>>>>>>>> them, Peace be unto you.
> >>>>>>>>>>> John 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of
> >>>>>>>>>>> coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now
> >>>>>>>>>>> caught.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great
> >>>>>>>>>>> fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so
> >>>>>>>>>>> many, yet was not the net broken.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the disciples durst
> >>>>>>>>>>> ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 13 Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish
> >>>>>>>>>>> likewise.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 14 This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his
> >>>>>>>>>>> disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
> >>>>>>>>>> The Bible still is not evidence. I asked for evidence.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>> The Bible is accepted as evidence in court.
> >>>>>>>> For what kinds of cases?
> >>>>>>> For any kind of case. A lawyer can request that a Bible be entered as
> >>>>>>> evidence in any court case. Clarence Darrow had the Bible entered as
> >>>>>>> evidence in the famous "monkey trial".
> >>>>>>> Riobert B. Winn
> >>>>>> A judge must be mad or loony if he were to allow for bible as
> >>>>>> evidence.
> >>>>>> You mean that ancient time recording can be the evidence for modern
> >>>>>> time crime or cases?
> >>>>>> This would also mean America is declining, at a rate faster than I
> >>>>>> thought.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>> Well, it happened in 1934, or whenever it was. So we have that
> >>>>> precedent in American jurisprudence.
> >>>> In only one type of trial, if it happened at all. Your credibility is
> >>>> nil at this point.
> >>> Well, judges of today are very careful to make certain that only
> >>> atheism is allowed in courtrooms.
> >> You mean, they'll only allow secular evidence?
>
> >>> That does not mean that the Bible
> >>> is not evidence. No matter how hard atheists try, they are unable to
> >>> make the Bible disappear. That is why it is evidence.
> >> Atheists are not trying to make the Bible disappear.
>
> >> It also isn't evidence, no matter hard you try to make it evidence.
>
> >> --
>
> > So you are saying that the Bible is like Hezekiah's tunnel, it does
> > not exist.
>
> Um. �No.
  If the Bible exists, then it is evidence.  So does it exist or not?
Robert B. Winn