🚀 go-pugleaf

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message 
news:7be0be8c-09fd-4d4f-a75b-75159bc75ae7@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 5, 7:34�pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>> > On Aug 5, 6:42 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>> >> rbwinn wrote:
>> >>> On Aug 4, 9:39 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>> >>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> >>>> On Aug 4, 10:13 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Aug 3, 9:31 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>> >>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Aug 2, 1:07 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> On Aug 1, 8:14 am, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>> >>>>>>>>news:f012c137-ec7a-4f41-acf8-81a047bcb82d@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> >>>>>>>>>> Smiler,
>> >>>>>>>>> I never go to alt.atheism.
>> >>>>>>>> Idiot - you are never out of it.
>> >>>>>>>> Every time you hit that send button with alt.atheism in your 
>> >>>>>>>> headers, you go
>> >>>>>>>> there.
>> >>>>>>>> All I am doing is responding to posts in
>> >>>>>>>>> sci.physics and sci.physics.relativity.
>> >>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>> >>>>>>>> And alt.atheism, cretin.
>> >>>>>>> I don't care what is in the headers. I have already told you how 
>> >>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>> avoid talking to me. Just take sci.physics and 
>> >>>>>>> sci.physics.relativity
>> >>>>>>> out of the header. I never go to alt.atheism.
>> >>>>>>> Robert b. Winn
>> >>>>>> The issue is really that some of us really object to lies. And 
>> >>>>>> when
>> >>>>>> we see lies, we feel the need to publicly denounce them to the 
>> >>>>>> same
>> >>>>>> audience as they were originally disseminated to.
>> >>>>>> Al- Hide quoted text -
>> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>> >>>>> If you object to lies, then you should stop posting lies in
>> >>>>> sci.physics and sci.physics.relativity. Lies are off topic in these
>> >>>>> newsgroups.
>> >>>>> Robert B. Winn
>> >>>> I haven't posted any lies. You however, have demonstrably posted 
>> >>>> many
>> >>>> lies
>> >>> It did not happen. I was the person who said that Hezekiah's tunnel
>> >>> exists, which was demonstrated to be true.
>> >> And King's Cross Station exists.
>>
>> > Does the Bible say that King's Cross Station exists?
>>
>> No, because, when the Bible was written, the station was not built yet.
>> � When the Bible was written, it didn't even REFERENCE the entire
>> country that would later be known as England.
>>
> Well, then you cannot prove the Bible wrong by using King's Cross
> Station.  You would have to use something in the Bible.
> Robert B. Winn

D'ya THINK???
Lol!

-- 
Steve O
a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter)
B.A.A.W.A.
Convicted by Earthquack
Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence