🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 5, 6:50�am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Aug 4, 10:10 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Aug 4, 8:35 pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> On Aug 4, 8:02 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 3, 8:56 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Aug 3, 4:29 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> >>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:12?am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up your claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one.
> >>>>>>>>>> I have a Bible. ?There's no evidence in there to back up your claim.
> >>>>>>>>> John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the
> >>>>>>>>> week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for
> >>>>>>>>> fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto
> >>>>>>>>> them, Peace be unto you.
> >>>>>>>>> John 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of
> >>>>>>>>> coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
> >>>>>>>>> 10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now
> >>>>>>>>> caught.
> >>>>>>>>> 11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great
> >>>>>>>>> fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so
> >>>>>>>>> many, yet was not the net broken.
> >>>>>>>>> 12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the disciples durst
> >>>>>>>>> ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord.
> >>>>>>>>> 13 Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish
> >>>>>>>>> likewise.
> >>>>>>>>> 14 This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his
> >>>>>>>>> disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
> >>>>>>>> The Bible still is not evidence. I asked for evidence.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>> The Bible is accepted as evidence in court.
> >>>>>> For what kinds of cases?
> >>>>> For any kind of case. A lawyer can request that a Bible be entered as
> >>>>> evidence in any court case. Clarence Darrow had the Bible entered as
> >>>>> evidence in the famous "monkey trial".
> >>>>> Riobert B. Winn
> >>>> A judge must be mad or loony if he were to allow for bible as
> >>>> evidence.
> >>>> You mean that ancient time recording can be the evidence for modern
> >>>> time crime or cases?
> >>>> This would also mean America is declining, at a rate faster than I
> >>>> thought.- Hide quoted text -
> >>> Well, it happened in 1934, or whenever it was. So we have that
> >>> precedent in American jurisprudence.
> >> In only one type of trial, if it happened at all. Your credibility is
> >> nil at this point.
>
> > Well, judges of today are very careful to make certain that only
> > atheism is allowed in courtrooms. �
>
> You mean, they'll only allow secular evidence?
>
> > That does not mean that the Bible
> > is not evidence. �No matter how hard atheists try, they are unable to
> > make the Bible disappear. �That is why it is evidence.
>
> Atheists are not trying to make the Bible disappear.
>
> It also isn't evidence, no matter hard you try to make it evidence.
>
> --
>
So you are saying that the Bible is like Hezekiah's tunnel, it does
not exist.
Robert B. Winn