🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 6, 12:03 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Aug 4, 10:33 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>
> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > On Aug 5, 8:48 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 3, 10:42 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>
> > > <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > > On Aug 2, 11:44 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Aug 1, 7:51 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:> rbwinn wrote:
> > > > > > > On Aug 1, 7:34 am, ben_dolan_...@reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote:
> > > > > > >> rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>> What makes a book fiction or non-fiction is the intent of the author or
> > > > > > >>> authors. A fiction book is an account of imaginary events.
> > > > > > >> Exactly so, and THAT is why the Bible is fiction. I'm glad you
> > > > > > >> understand that, you may be making progress.
>
> > > > > > > The proclamation of an atheist has no real power. It does not change
> > > > > > > reality.
>
> > > > > > And the proclamation of a religious nutter such as yourself has even
> > > > > > less power. It doesn't even acknowledge reality.
>
> > > > > So why was I the one who acknowledged that Hezekiah's tunnel exists
> > > > > while atheists tried to claim that tour guides in Jerusalem were
> > > > > taking tourists through solid rock?
> > > > > Robert B. Winn
>
> > > > This is another of your more persistent lies. No-one said at any
> > > > stage that there is no tunnel.
>
> > > > Al- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > You continue to say that the Bible is nothing but mythology. If you
> > > say that the Bible is nothing but mythology, you are saying that the
> > > tunnel is mythology because the Bible describes the construction of
> > > Hezekiah's tunnel in three different books of the Old Testament.
> > > Robert B. Winn
>
> > No. You continue to not see the point. It is quite disturbing.
> > Greek mythology mentions Mount Olympus and Athens, both of which exist
> > today. This does not mean that Athens is mythological.
> > Surely you can't be THAT stupid.
>
> I am not so stupid as to believe that an atheist would ever do
> anything but deny that Hezekiah's tunnel exists.  If you tell me that
> you believe the tunnel exists, all you are doing is saying that you
> would tell the next person it does not exist.

And this is where you fail.  You clearly prefer the voices in your
head to reality.  I believe this is called scitzophrenia in medical
journals.  Why is it that religious people tend so strongly to
scitzophrenia, do you think?  Might it be that a disconnection to
reality is required to continue believing that crap?

> That is how you do
> things.   Since that is the way you are, I just keep it simple by
> saying that you continue to deny the existence of the tunnel.  Denying
> the veracity of anything in the Bible is more important to you than
> the existence of the tunnel.   As long as it remains that way, you do
> not admit that the tunnel exists.  All you are doing is just putting
> words together in an attempt to deceive.
> Robert B. Winn

All you are doing is arguing with the voices in your head.  You here
admit that you are talking to what you think we are thinking, instead
of what we say.  The fact that your ideas of the conversation don't
actually have anything to do with what anyone is saying never enters
your dim head.

The only atheist who thinks like you believe atheists think, is the
one in your own head!

Al