🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 3, 8:09�am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Aug 2, 7:28 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Aug 2, 4:22 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 2, 9:51 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Aug 1, 7:33 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 6:48 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:48:10 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 9:07?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>news:6feg2oFb88s6U1@mid.individual.net...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>news:03071fc3-e432-49b6-a4a5-c22bd4a879ab@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 9:45?pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 10:47 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 1:19 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 12:11 am, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 9:59 am, "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:85ce5d7c-67c2-4090-8fd1-14d9b48f203d@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are only two commandments in the Law of Christ:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Love the Lord thy God, Love thy neighbor as thyself.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ========
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, but I draw the line at giving my neighbour hand jobs.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (as he will no doubt be relieved to hear).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone who engages in homosexuality does not love the other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since he is contributing to that person's damnation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up this silly claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you take it up with Einstein when he returns, that idea
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing to do with me.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would Einstein be interested in homosexuality?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would Jesus?- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All homosexuals will be judged by Jesus, the same as with sinners of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any kind.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't we just wait for him before judging them then?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I happen to think that if anyone needs judging it is the liars and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrites. ?But you don't see me campaigning to remove their human
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yes, I do. ? Like other atheists you campaign for abortion,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which removes the right to live of the people who are killed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Stop being such an idiot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you equate atheism with pro-abortionism?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They are not the same thing.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You have already been corrected in your mistaken belief that all atheists
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> are pro-abortion, so why do you insist on lying?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> We may be (and I am) pro-choice, but none, AFAIK, are pro-abortion.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Pro-choice today is used interchangably with pro-abortion.
> >>>>>>>>>> Only by liars, particularly the liars who call themselves pro-life, but
> >>>>>>>>>> prove by their politics that they love killing people.
> >>>>>>>>>>> You are
> >>>>>>>>>>> not pro-choice because you are opposed to the choices that would be
> >>>>>>>>>>> made by any children killed by abortion.
> >>>>>>>>>> Children are not killed by abortion.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>> Well, here we are at another word besides gay that atheists are trying
> >>>>>>>>> to change the meaning of. Fortunately for Christian people, we have
> >>>>>>>>> the Bible.
> >>>>>>>>> Luke 2:4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of
> >>>>>>>>> Nazareth, into Judea, unto the city of David, which is called
> >>>>>>>>> Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)
> >>>>>>>>> 5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.
> >>>>>>>>> So do you really think you are going to be able to change the meaning?
> >>>>>>>> Yes. We're not going to allow you to change the meaning of the word
> >>>>>>>> "child" to mean anything from fertilization on.
> >>>>>>> Well, take a good look at verse five. That was not written by me. It
> >>>>>>> was written by a physician .
> >>>>>> Verse 5....in which translation?
> >>>>>> Hint: Luke was not written in English.
> >>>>> It means the same in Greek as it does in English.
> >>>> Yes. It doesn't say anything about "child". It says " (egkuos)".
> >>>> Egkuos means pregnant.
> >>> So you are saying that Luke as a physician was so ignorant that he
> >>> could not tell that a pregnant woman was with child?
> >> Luke didn't write the Gospel of Luke, numbnuts.
>
> >> Secondly, "with child" is not a medical term. It is a colloquialism.
> >> Are you seriously suggesting that, since some people call being pregnant
> >> being "with child", that that means that there is a child in the womb?
>
> >> I was at the store today and I heard a wife call her husband a "honey
> >> bunny". Does that mean that husband is lapine in nature and is covered
> >> in the thick processed pollen of flowers?
>
> > So you say you were convinced that a pregnant woman does not have a
> > child in her womb because a woman at the store called her husband
> > honey bunny. �
>
> Right. �We use a lot of nonstandard words for things.
>
> Point being, there is no actual child in the womb and the husband is not
> a rabbit.
>
> > What you probably will want to do is to find someone who
> > reads a lot of Harry Potter books and tell that person about your
> > experience. �Since I read the Bible, it just does not have the same
> > effect on me.
>
> I do talk about Harry Potter... AS FICTION.
>
> --
> ****************************************************
> * � � � � �DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 � � � � �*
> *--------------------------------------------------*
> * Can God create a Thai dish so spicy that even He *
> * can't eat it? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �*
> ****************************************************- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well, I talk about your idea that a pregnant woman does not have a
child in her womb AS FICTION.
Robert B. Winn