🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 3, 8:08�am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Aug 2, 7:26 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Aug 2, 4:20 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 2, 9:46 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Aug 1, 7:25 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 6:35 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:34:42 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 8:48?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "DanielSan" <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>news:ueOdnfvcNJRl1wzVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@speakeasy.net...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 6:19?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:5b37c66a-589f-4dc3-8ef3-b8ce66e66846@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 10:12?pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 6:14?pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 10:08 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:efa8da13-56b6-4386-bfe5-c571b689a669@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is the same yesterday, today, and forever.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have no evidence at all about God.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you like me to send you a copy of the Bible?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You could, but it would be much better if you could provide some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God as well.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve O
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God sent His Only Begotten Son, Steve. ?If that was not enough for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you, nothing I could do or say is going to convince you of anything.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You idiot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of American soldiers died for their country and died for you,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not even one of them had been recognized by you to be much better
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than the stupid Jesus who was a Middle-Eastern person in ancient time?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You must be a real traitor and a mentally impaired shit !- Hide quoted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The person you refer to as the stupid Jesus who was a middle eastern
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person in ancient time advised soldiers to do no violence to any man.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe fewer American soldiers would have died for their country if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they had paid more attention to what Jesus said. ?Anyway, you are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starting to sound like a Nazi propagandist about what a traitor is. ?I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already did four years in the American military.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ===================================
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you didn't take your supposed jesus' advice.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why was that?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I did take the advice of Jesus. ?I worked on radar instead of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shooting other people while I was in the military.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So, you told others where they could kill.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The admitted liar now admits to hypocrisy as well.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Par for the course for xians.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Radar just shows the positions of airplanes and ships. It does not
> >>>>>>>>>>> tell anyone to do anything.
> >>>>>>>>>> How disingenuous of you.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>>> As I understand it, you are saying that you think I am a killer
> >>>>>>>>> because I fixed radar in the Navy, while you as a harmless civilian
> >>>>>>>>> just voted for pro-abortion political candidates, so you are
> >>>>>>>>> completely innocent of shedding blood.
> >>>>>>>> Sorry, but there's no such thing as a pro-abortion political candidate.
> >>>>>>> Well, you vote for the candidates you like, and I will vote for the
> >>>>>>> candidates I like.
> >>>>>> Sounds good, but what does that have to do with the lack of existence of
> >>>>>> "pro-abortion" political candidates?
> >>>>> Don't worry about it. There will never be any lack of pro-abortion
> >>>>> candidates for you to vote for.
> >>>> Can you list these "pro-abortion" candidates for me? I can't find any.
> >>>> Please cite quotes from these candidates that made you think they're
> >>>> "pro-abortion".
> >>> Immoral people are going to want the option of abortion.
> >> Which is in total contradiction of being "pro-abortion".
>
> >>> Immoral
> >>> people are going to support immoral candidates for office. So we have
> >>> an immoral government.
> >> Immoral to you, perhaps.
>
> >>> The government of the United States is the
> >>> people. In case you did not notice, the people are immoral. So what
> >>> are you trying to do, convince me that these immoral people do not
> >>> elect pro-abortion candidates to office?
> >> I am saying that there's no such thing as a "pro-abortion candidate".
>
> >>> Most of the people in public office are pro-abortion.
> >> Um, no. No, they're not.
>
> > It does not matter what you say or think. �
>
> Sorry, but I speak from fact, not opinion.
>
> > What matters is what these
> > people do in public office. �They support population control by means
> > of abortion, just the same as is done in China.
>
> Which does not make them "pro-abortion".
>
> --
>
I would definitely consider that to be pro abortion.
Robert B. Winn