Article View: sci.physics
Article #12138Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:28
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:28
65 lines
4371 bytes
4371 bytes
On Jul 21, 12:22 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > On Jul 20, 2:16�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > > > <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > On Jul 19, 3:21 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 18, 5:32 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote: > > > > > rbwinn wrote: > > > > > On Jul 17, 6:47 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote: > > > > >>>> -- > > > > >>> George W. Bush is completely irrelevant, as the next President of the > > > > >>> United States will be. �All major decisions are made by the atheistic > > > > >>> Supreme Court, which at the present time holds the position of > > > > >>> Judicial dictatorship in the United States. > > > > >> Religious affiliations of Supreme Court Justices: > > > > >> Roberts: Roman Catholic > > > > >> Stevens: Protestant > > > > >> Scalia: Roman Catholic > > > > >> Kennedy: Roman Catholic > > > > >> Souter: Episcopalian > > > > >> Thomas: Roman Catholic > > > > >> Breyer: Jewish > > > > >> Alito: Roman Catholic > > > > >> Ginsburg: Jewish > > > > > >> The Supreme Court follows the Constitution of the United States of > > > > >> America, the federal law of the land. > > > > > >> What were you saying again? > > > > > >> -- > > > > > During my lifetime the Supreme Court has not made even one decision > > > > > that did not promote atheism. �It does not matter if they all claim to > > > > > be religious. �Actions speak louder than words. > > > > > Perhaps you can name me one decision that "promoted atheism". > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Roe v. Wade > > > > Robert B. Winn > > > Roe v Wade was a decision made on the grounds of violation of > > privacy. �Not a theological argument anywhere. > > Any more? > > > Al- Hide quoted text - > > Roe v. Wade was made on the grounds of atheism. > Robert B. Winn You might want to review some court transcripts of the case. It was based on a privacy issue. Saying otherwise doesn't make it any less true. Al
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0122ea37-770e-4052-aad5-f2de3556e795@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<sba274h0m6sfce2dq2q7nqsrh2lca5pnva@4ax.com> <d6fc20c0-098d-43b2-a8ec-3cc7b4d8dac7@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <kaSdndXcdpQZNeHVnZ2dnUVZ8rGdnZ2d@bt.com> <ccb99694-055d-4154-893a-872085daf30d@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <BcudnaoqD5RkteLVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com> <476cc203-1500-4d0f-b16f-daa4210ab9d7@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <vIudnZtb_aaLo-LVnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@speakeasy.net> <e3bdfbcd-c945-4830-a135-a050a475802c@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <7uKdndfnpO2Ba-LVnZ2dnUVZ_hzinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <e9a3738e-876d-42b7-aeb5-d4c6cf0a22ee@q28g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <c_CdnfIZCtD0EB3VnZ2dnUVZ_uLinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <9445436b-52c9-44e7-8b37-1a8008c43c98@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <b141bbb4-382f-4e64-920e-93443cf9fce2@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <7dcaead7-7298-40bc-a84d-3ea6119576cc@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,dac8026861d35fee X-Google-Thread: f442a,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 116469,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid102f53,gidf442a,gid116469,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" <alwhipp@optusnet.com.au> Newsgroups: sci.physics,cam.misc,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism Subject: Re: Does God need to prove He exists? Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 65 Message-ID: <0122ea37-770e-4052-aad5-f2de3556e795@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com> References: <sba274h0m6sfce2dq2q7nqsrh2lca5pnva@4ax.com> <d6fc20c0-098d-43b2-a8ec-3cc7b4d8dac7@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <kaSdndXcdpQZNeHVnZ2dnUVZ8rGdnZ2d@bt.com> <ccb99694-055d-4154-893a-872085daf30d@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <BcudnaoqD5RkteLVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com> <476cc203-1500-4d0f-b16f-daa4210ab9d7@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <vIudnZtb_aaLo-LVnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@speakeasy.net> <e3bdfbcd-c945-4830-a135-a050a475802c@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <7uKdndfnpO2Ba-LVnZ2dnUVZ_hzinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <e9a3738e-876d-42b7-aeb5-d4c6cf0a22ee@q28g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <c_CdnfIZCtD0EB3VnZ2dnUVZ_uLinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <9445436b-52c9-44e7-8b37-1a8008c43c98@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <b141bbb4-382f-4e64-920e-93443cf9fce2@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <7dcaead7-7298-40bc-a84d-3ea6119576cc@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.9.185.217 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1216607298 12801 127.0.0.1 (21 Jul 2008 02:28:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.9.185.217; posting-account=oq_tpwoAAABC0qABVCSraLayCjGQBILm User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 Firefox/2.0.0.16,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 citcwpi1.pclan.citec.com.au:3128 (IronPort-WSA/5.5.2-030)