🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Jul 18, 8:09 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>>> On Jul 18, 2:40 am, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>>> On Jul 17, 10:23 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 16, 7:43 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>> On Jul 17, 5:36 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 15, 11:16 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 11:50 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 10:51 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 7:13 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 10:39 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 3:26 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 11:59 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 12:01�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Linda Fox" <linda...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8vih74pvkgdkcmula0art55aogmd3pvne1@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:20:29 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A two year old is learning to lie or tell the truth. �If a two year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old sees its parents lie all the time, then the two year old is going
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do the same thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ho-kayyyy - tell us please, because we'd love to know, how a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two-year-old can tell its parents are lying when it does not know the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truth itself. Unless it's by watching the nose grow longer and longer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Linda ff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This man obviously has no children.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has absolutely no idea what a two year old can or can't do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look, Bobby, he's two.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has no fucking clue what an atheist or a theist is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He's under my feet right now, pushing toy cars around the floor and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shouting, "Beep Beep"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't even know what a lie is, so how can you expect him to recognize
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve O
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He does not even care.  All he is doing is what he sees you doing.  If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he finds lying to be more effective in getting what he wants, he is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well lets hope he nenver gets involved in religion then, so he wont need to.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How are you going to shield him from the Lorentz equations?  If he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes to school there are books everywhere explaining the miracle of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> length contraction.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What miracle?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If he is smart enough, he wont need to have it explained, he will work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it out for himself: if he isn't smart enough, he will simply ignore it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as irrelevant to his life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What he will never get, is someone telling him its the Truth, and if he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't believe it, he will go to hell for eternity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scientists say that the Lorentz equations show that an object in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motion contracts in length relative to a frame of reference at rest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until at the speed of light, the object has a length of zero.  So you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are bringing up your son in a religion called atheism that has one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> miracle.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whether it is many miracles or only one, a miracle is a miracle.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What makes you think Lorentz equations are part of atheism?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it the same delusion that has you repeatedly posting garbage into
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Most scientists of today are atheists.  I was discussing the Lorentz
>>>>>>>>>>>> equations with scientists in sci.physics.relativity when you atheists
>>>>>>>>>>>> butted into the conversation in that newsgroup.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>> Most scientists today are atheists, yes.  But it's like saying most
>>>>>>>>>>> people with blonde hair have blue eyes.  The two things aren't
>>>>>>>>>>> actually related.
>>>>>>>>>>> And you keep lying about how you started this.  One fruitcake who
>>>>>>>>>>> claims to be both a scientist and a christian (but bizarely doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> understand rainbows) cross-posted originally and you waded in with
>>>>>>>>>>> your lies and confusion into a topic that was already about proving
>>>>>>>>>>> this god thing.  And proceeded to lie about everyone.
>>>>>>>>>>> And now you keep using this myth you've invented about atheists
>>>>>>>>>>> posting into YOUR conversation about physics.
>>>>>>>>>> I think the two could be related. Not saying they are, I think that it's
>>>>>>>>>> likely though. Just my opinion.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>> I think they are related also.  Scientists and atheists have a
>>>>>>>>> religion that believes in one miracle, length contraction.
>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>> Well, OK, Natural, show how the length contraction is not a miracle.
>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>>> Define "miracle"
>>>>>> Al- Hide quoted text -
>>>>> Miracles are manifestations of higher laws.
>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>> Define "manifestation" and "higher laws".
>>>> Al- Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> Al, why don't you just go to Merriam-Webster online and look them up
>>> for yourself?  If you do not understand words, just go to a
>>> dictionary.
>> Okay, had a look on dictionary.com. So do you think that your religion
>> puts you above the law?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> 
> Above what law?

The law of the land.