Article View: sci.physics
Article #12578Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
From: rbwinn
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:50
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:50
156 lines
8697 bytes
8697 bytes
On Jul 18, 2:40 am, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > On Jul 17, 10:23 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 7:43 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > > <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > On Jul 17, 5:36 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 15, 11:16 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote: > > > > > > rbwinn wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 14, 11:50 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote: > > > > > >> Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) wrote: > > > > > > >>> On Jul 14, 10:51 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>> On Jul 13, 7:13 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > > > > >>>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > > > >>>>> On Jul 14, 10:39 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>> On Jul 13, 3:26 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 11:59 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 12:01�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> "Linda Fox" <linda...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>news:8vih74pvkgdkcmula0art55aogmd3pvne1@4ax.com... > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:20:29 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> A two year old is learning to lie or tell the truth. �If a two year > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> old sees its parents lie all the time, then the two year old is going > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to do the same thing. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ho-kayyyy - tell us please, because we'd love to know, how a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> two-year-old can tell its parents are lying when it does not know the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> truth itself. Unless it's by watching the nose grow longer and longer. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Linda ff > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This man obviously has no children. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> He has absolutely no idea what a two year old can or can't do. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Look, Bobby, he's two. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> He has no fucking clue what an atheist or a theist is. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> He's under my feet right now, pushing toy cars around the floor and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> shouting, "Beep Beep" > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't even know what a lie is, so how can you expect him to recognize > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> one? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Steve O > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> He does not even care. All he is doing is what he sees you doing. If > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> he finds lying to be more effective in getting what he wants, he is > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> going to lie. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Well lets hope he nenver gets involved in religion then, so he wont need to. > > > > > >>>>>>>> How are you going to shield him from the Lorentz equations? If he > > > > > >>>>>>>> goes to school there are books everywhere explaining the miracle of > > > > > >>>>>>>> length contraction. > > > > > >>>>>>> What miracle? > > > > > >>>>>>> If he is smart enough, he wont need to have it explained, he will work > > > > > >>>>>>> it out for himself: if he isn't smart enough, he will simply ignore it > > > > > >>>>>>> as irrelevant to his life. > > > > > >>>>>>> What he will never get, is someone telling him its the Truth, and if he > > > > > >>>>>>> doesn't believe it, he will go to hell for eternity. > > > > > >>>>>> Scientists say that the Lorentz equations show that an object in > > > > > >>>>>> motion contracts in length relative to a frame of reference at rest > > > > > >>>>>> until at the speed of light, the object has a length of zero. So you > > > > > >>>>>> are bringing up your son in a religion called atheism that has one > > > > > >>>>>> miracle. > > > > > >>>>>> Whether it is many miracles or only one, a miracle is a miracle. > > > > > >>>>>> Robert B. Winn > > > > > >>>>> What makes you think Lorentz equations are part of atheism? > > > > > >>>>> Is it the same delusion that has you repeatedly posting garbage into > > > > > >>>>> alt.atheism? > > > > > >>>> Most scientists of today are atheists. I was discussing the Lorentz > > > > > >>>> equations with scientists in sci.physics.relativity when you atheists > > > > > >>>> butted into the conversation in that newsgroup. > > > > > >>>> Robert B. Winn > > > > > >>> Most scientists today are atheists, yes. But it's like saying most > > > > > >>> people with blonde hair have blue eyes. The two things aren't > > > > > >>> actually related. > > > > > >>> And you keep lying about how you started this. One fruitcake who > > > > > >>> claims to be both a scientist and a christian (but bizarely doesn't > > > > > >>> understand rainbows) cross-posted originally and you waded in with > > > > > >>> your lies and confusion into a topic that was already about proving > > > > > >>> this god thing. And proceeded to lie about everyone. > > > > > >>> And now you keep using this myth you've invented about atheists > > > > > >>> posting into YOUR conversation about physics. > > > > > >> I think the two could be related. Not saying they are, I think that it's > > > > > >> likely though. Just my opinion.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > I think they are related also. Scientists and atheists have a > > > > > > religion that believes in one miracle, length contraction. > > > > > > liar. > > > > > Well, OK, Natural, show how the length contraction is not a miracle. > > > > Robert B. Winn > > > > Define "miracle" > > > > Al- Hide quoted text - > > > Miracles are manifestations of higher laws. > > Robert B. Winn > > Define "manifestation" and "higher laws". > > Al- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Al, why don't you just go to Merriam-Webster online and look them up for yourself? If you do not understand words, just go to a dictionary. Robert B. Winn
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<336dea3b-5026-444a-9ddd-3ea217904a0e@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<b5b6f491-e806-49c6-b723-4541541802a7@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <9e251d12-47ea-4351-ac79-51c3412006fd@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1215988071.6483.2@proxy01.news.clara.net> <d238d4e1-fa48-4170-ab36-d6684ec35bfd@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1f272fec-035a-4030-9a5b-d20eb0132b8d@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <46b14f2d-d892-4b79-bdda-fe4cf8efe04a@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com> <1e3222ee-194c-4c64-8265-cb2a45886a4c@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <487c48bf$1@clear.net.nz> <7a2e0f54-5e17-45f0-bef5-3958f0e32237@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1216188999.18724.3@proxy00.news.clara.net> <cce3d274-d7f2-42bc-b57b-357eee67655f@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <7be897ab-9305-4fe2-9af3-d456e497326c@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <0463d3f5-d482-449d-adb0-81af090ba244@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com> <38fa1742-1bdf-4f2b-8a85-2c53710175e4@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,dac8026861d35fee X-Google-Thread: f442a,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 116469,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid102f53,gidf442a,gid116469,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,cam.misc,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism Subject: Re: Does God need to prove He exists? Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 156 Message-ID: <336dea3b-5026-444a-9ddd-3ea217904a0e@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> References: <b5b6f491-e806-49c6-b723-4541541802a7@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <9e251d12-47ea-4351-ac79-51c3412006fd@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1215988071.6483.2@proxy01.news.clara.net> <d238d4e1-fa48-4170-ab36-d6684ec35bfd@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1f272fec-035a-4030-9a5b-d20eb0132b8d@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <46b14f2d-d892-4b79-bdda-fe4cf8efe04a@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com> <1e3222ee-194c-4c64-8265-cb2a45886a4c@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <487c48bf$1@clear.net.nz> <7a2e0f54-5e17-45f0-bef5-3958f0e32237@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1216188999.18724.3@proxy00.news.clara.net> <cce3d274-d7f2-42bc-b57b-357eee67655f@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <7be897ab-9305-4fe2-9af3-d456e497326c@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <0463d3f5-d482-449d-adb0-81af090ba244@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com> <38fa1742-1bdf-4f2b-8a85-2c53710175e4@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.117.9 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1216421452 10375 127.0.0.1 (18 Jul 2008 22:50:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.188.117.9; posting-account=i6vpvwoAAABRbNds_JrzhNT-NaeHIrDG User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.1; AOLBuild 4334.36; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.1.5 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 spider-dtc-tc09.proxy.aol.com[CDBC7049] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1 cache-dtc-ae05.proxy.aol.com[CDBC7509] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])