🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 17, 5:32 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Jul 16, 8:55 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Jul 16, 6:06 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 15, 5:24 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Jul 14, 8:27 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 5:12�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>news:44f19f98-4d96-4419-a87a-d6bdbd73f31b@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Their idea is that if Hezekiah's tunnel exists, then Harry Potter has
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to be true because the train station in London is mentioned in Harry
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Potter.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Exactly. Since we know therefore that harry potter isn't true, the fact
> >>>>>>>>>>>> of hezekiahs tunnel means the bible is obviously false. Since we have
> >>>>>>>>>>>> true facts referred to in works of complete fiction.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> By your reasoning at least.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, you have it exactly as atheists have been telling me it is.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Don't ask me what it is supposed to mean.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>>>>>>>> Here is an example of rbwinn's logic.
> >>>>>>>>>> Sheep are mentioned in the bible
> >>>>>>>>>> Sheep exist today
> >>>>>>>>>> The bible is accurate and there is a God
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Steve O
> >>>>>>>>> Well, no, Steve O.  Here is an example.  Atheists were claiming that
> >>>>>>>>> nothing existed on earth today that could prove anything in the
> >>>>>>>>> Bible.  So I said, What about Hezekiah's tunnel?  These atheists had
> >>>>>>>>> never heard of Hezekiah's tunnel.  So after they looked it up, they
> >>>>>>>>> said, The fact that a tunnel exists no more proves the Bible to be
> >>>>>>>>> true than Harry Potter leaving from the train station in London to go
> >>>>>>>>> to wizard's school.
> >>>>>>>> The original assertion remains in force.  Hezekiah's Tunnel does not
> >>>>>>>> prove anything.
> >>>>>>>>>    I really believe that it certainly does prove certain verses in the
> >>>>>>>>> Old Testament to be true which describe the digging of Hezekiah's
> >>>>>>>>> tunnel.  Otherwise, atheists need to explain why there is a tunnel
> >>>>>>>>> exactly where the Bible in three books of the Old Testament says a
> >>>>>>>>> tunnel was dug as a conduit for water.
> >>>>>>>> For the same reason that King's Cross Station exists.
> >>>>>>>> Wow, you REALLY aren't getting the analogy, are you?
> >>>>>>> There is nothing in the Book of 2 Chronicles about the construction of
> >>>>>>> King's Cross Station.
> >>>>>> Wow, you REALLY aren't getting the analogy, are you?
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>> Well, if you can provide a description of the construction of Kings
> >>>>> Cross station from the time it was built, maybe we could compare it to
> >>>>> the Biblical account of the construction of Hezekiah's tunnel.
> >>>> ....I see.  So, since the Harry Potter books do not detail the
> >>>> construction of King's Cross Station, it's not a correct analogy?
> >>>> Okay, fine.  In one of the Harry Potter books, the head of the Ministry
> >>>> of Magic visits the new Prime Minister of England and informs him of the
> >>>> fight against the Dark Lord.
> >>>> Since this Harry Potter book describes the Prime Minister of England at
> >>>> the time that he got into office and, since it coincided with Tony Blair
> >>>> getting into office, that means that Harry Potter is true?
> >>>> --
> >>>> ******************************************************
> >>>> *          DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226            *
> >>> Well, if you want to believe in Harry Potter, I am sure you will find
> >>> a way to do it.
> >> No, see, that's what you're NOT getting.  I don't believe in Harry
> >> Potter.  Harry Potter is fantasy.  It's not real.   And the events
> >> therein have just as much evidence as the Bible has.
>
> >> That is:  None.
> > If atheists think something is fantasy, why is fantasy all they want
> > to discuss?
>
> You're the one that brought fantasy into the discussion.
>
> --
Well, no, that is incorrect.  I was discussing the theory of
relativity and Hezekiah's tunnel.  Atheists always try to change the
subject to Harry Potter.
Robert B. Winn