🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 16, 6:06 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Jul 15, 5:24 am, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Jul 14, 8:27 pm, DanielSan <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 14, 5:12�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>news:44f19f98-4d96-4419-a87a-d6bdbd73f31b@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>> Their idea is that if Hezekiah's tunnel exists, then Harry Potter has
> >>>>>>>>> to be true because the train station in London is mentioned in Harry
> >>>>>>>>> Potter.
> >>>>>>>> Exactly. Since we know therefore that harry potter isn't true, the fact
> >>>>>>>> of hezekiahs tunnel means the bible is obviously false. Since we have
> >>>>>>>> true facts referred to in works of complete fiction.
> >>>>>>>> By your reasoning at least.
> >>>>>>> Well, you have it exactly as atheists have been telling me it is.
> >>>>>>> Don't ask me what it is supposed to mean.
> >>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> >>>>>> Here is an example of rbwinn's logic.
> >>>>>> Sheep are mentioned in the bible
> >>>>>> Sheep exist today
> >>>>>> The bible is accurate and there is a God
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Steve O
> >>>>> Well, no, Steve O.  Here is an example.  Atheists were claiming that
> >>>>> nothing existed on earth today that could prove anything in the
> >>>>> Bible.  So I said, What about Hezekiah's tunnel?  These atheists had
> >>>>> never heard of Hezekiah's tunnel.  So after they looked it up, they
> >>>>> said, The fact that a tunnel exists no more proves the Bible to be
> >>>>> true than Harry Potter leaving from the train station in London to go
> >>>>> to wizard's school.
> >>>> The original assertion remains in force.  Hezekiah's Tunnel does not
> >>>> prove anything.
> >>>>>    I really believe that it certainly does prove certain verses in the
> >>>>> Old Testament to be true which describe the digging of Hezekiah's
> >>>>> tunnel.  Otherwise, atheists need to explain why there is a tunnel
> >>>>> exactly where the Bible in three books of the Old Testament says a
> >>>>> tunnel was dug as a conduit for water.
> >>>> For the same reason that King's Cross Station exists.
> >>>> Wow, you REALLY aren't getting the analogy, are you?
> >>> There is nothing in the Book of 2 Chronicles about the construction of
> >>> King's Cross Station.
> >> Wow, you REALLY aren't getting the analogy, are you?
>
> >> --
> > Well, if you can provide a description of the construction of Kings
> > Cross station from the time it was built, maybe we could compare it to
> > the Biblical account of the construction of Hezekiah's tunnel.
>
> ....I see.  So, since the Harry Potter books do not detail the
> construction of King's Cross Station, it's not a correct analogy?
>
> Okay, fine.  In one of the Harry Potter books, the head of the Ministry
> of Magic visits the new Prime Minister of England and informs him of the
> fight against the Dark Lord.
>
> Since this Harry Potter book describes the Prime Minister of England at
> the time that he got into office and, since it coincided with Tony Blair
> getting into office, that means that Harry Potter is true?
>
> --
> ******************************************************
> *          DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226            *

Well, if you want to believe in Harry Potter, I am sure you will find
a way to do it.
Robert B. Winn