🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2:51 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>>> On Jul 13, 3:42 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 13, 12:17 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 6:33�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:5cb50cba-4ba0-439e-b696-171329756f9a@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 8:32?pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 8:08 pm, Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...@swbell.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 04:54:03 +0100, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:a122c089-a15c-4a1f-9e0c-9f988874845c@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 9, 11:00 am, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 8:24?pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean there isn't any evidence he existed and it upsets you that
>>>>>>>>>>>> atheists notice this fact...- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>> I could care less what atheists do.
>>>>>>>>>>> ===========================
>>>>>>>>>>> Then WTF do you reply to us?
>>>>>>>>>>> Smiler,
>>>>>>>>>>> The godless one
>>>>>>>>>>> a.a.# 2279
>>>>>>>>>> I'm not speaking for Robert, but my replies aren't to you, or to any
>>>>>>>>>> specific atheist. My replies are intended for other readers who
>>>>>>>>>> haven't yet passed the point of no return, and might be looking for
>>>>>>>>>> insights from a Christian's perspective. ? Gordon
>>>>>>>>> Yes, you wish to return to the dark age when everything was barbaric.
>>>>>>>>> The Christian perspective as as evil as human can imagine....the
>>>>>>>>> killing of non-believers, the slavery, the slaughter of Indians in
>>>>>>>>> North/South America for their lands, the conquest of Iraq for its
>>>>>>>>> oil...
>>>>>>>>> Do we need to forward more examples?
>>>>>>>>> And what about the sins of greed, murder planted by your god? You
>>>>>>>>> can't pick goodies for god and badies ?not from god. I guess you will
>>>>>>>>> be just as hypocrite to pick and choose.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>> Well, you are certainly welcome to your own opinion of me.
>>>>>>>> ==============================
>>>>>>>> The general opinion of you in a.a. is that you're a pig-ignorant, obnoxious,
>>>>>>>> rude, cowardly, lying moron without the intelligence (or is it honesty?) to
>>>>>>>> understand a simple concept. You have no concept of logic or the real world
>>>>>>>> outside your religion.
>>>>>>>> Smiler,
>>>>>>> It seems strange to me that you would want to talk to someone you
>>>>>>> believe is the way you describe me.  What causes you to keep making
>>>>>>> these posts?
>>>>>> its scientific research. Its not often you get the chance to probe the
>>>>>> depths of human delusion, stupidity and cupidity to the extent that you
>>>>>> offer.
>>>>> I see.  You probably say something similar about looking at
>>>>> pornography.
>>>> Whilst I admit that talking to you is somewhat akin to conversing with a
>>>> paedophile, I personally haven't seen any pornography since I had tea
>>>> with a gay christian, whose rent boy pulled it all out from under the
>>>> sofa to show us 'what we get up to'..
>>>> That was in my time of hanging ou with the London society of the Golden
>>>> Dawn. Started by that great ex (plymouth Brethren) christian, Aleister
>>>> Crowley.
>>>> sadly on all counts it was a waste of time.
>>>  Uh huh.  Well, I was not asking for details of your sins.  They do
>>> not interest me.
>> That's because you are an utterly selfish person.
>>
>> If you were not interested in my so called sins, why did you make te
>> statement:-
>>
>>  >>> I see.  You probably say something similar about looking at
>>  >>> pornography.
>>
>>

No. I am referring to them as 'so called' sins. That is sins as defined 
by YOU.

> So are you admitting that you have sins?  This would be a first for an
> atheist.  All other atheists tell me that they do not have sins
> because whatever they do is not sin.

I have what YOU call sins. They aren't, because the concept is 
meaningless. In absolute terms.


> Robert B. Winn