🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 14, 1:12 am, "pba...@worldonline.nl" <pba...@worldonline.nl>
wrote:
> On 13 jul, 16:22, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 13, 12:10 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>
> > > rbwinn wrote:
> > > > On Jul 12, 7:29�am, Stan-O <bndsna...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > >> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:21:44 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com>
> > > >> wrote:
>
> > > >>>>> You atheists seem to have a lot of trouble with the meanings of
> > > >>>>> words. ?There was another atheist who seemed to believe that adult and
> > > >>>>> adulterer meant the same thing.
> > > >>>>> Robert B. Winn
> > > >>>> ...which is an old joke that you obviously didn't get.
> > > >>> It is a very foolish mistake. �Although the two words look and sound
> > > >>> similar, they mean very different things.
> > > >>> Robert B. Winn
> > > >> I'd explain the meaning of "a play on words", but it would be like
> > > >> pouring water on a rock and expecting it to sink in...
>
> > > > With atheists, it is not a play on words.  They really believe that
> > > > adulterers are the most mature adults.
>
> > > Atheists don't believe anything.
>
> > > More lies from the Prince of Lies.
>
> > > Its amazing how much ore of an atheist I want to be, listening to you.
>
> > Well, there you have it.  Atheists don't believe anything, they don't
> > do anything, and they don't think anything.  It does not sound very
> > exciting to me, but maybe it does to an atheist.
> > Robert B. Winn- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
>
> Well. Atheist are not lying their butt off like you do.
> Most of them believe in natural explanations,
> most of them have a job,
> and many of them are intelligent enough not to make as silly a claim
> as to say someone else doesn't think anything.
>
> Your statement would be truth though if it was made about dead people.
> But if all dead people are atheists, what would that mean for heaven
> and hell?
>
> Think about it!
> I am sure you have enough brains to understand,
> I only doubt whether you will use them on this issue or perfer to keep
> making silly statements
>
> Peter van Velzen
> July 2008
> Amstelveen
> The Netherlands

That's where you are wrong, Peter.
You think rbwinn got brain? OK, has a brain but without cells...
But you do not know he has mental problem, which the scientists have
not come up with any cure yet?