🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 7, 8:31 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Jul 6, 8:59�pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 20:53:52 -0700 (PDT), "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
> > <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> > >On Jul 7, 9:25 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 23:46:07 +0100, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com>
> > >> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> > >> >"rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> > >> >news:8b1223f1-9281-4b80-9157-b3b335a16970@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > >> >> I don't have to be familiar with Satan to know that a plot to betray
> > >> >> Jesus Christ came from him, not God.
> > >> >> Robert B. Winn
>
> > >> >So are you saying that the crucifixion was the work of Satan, and that
> > >> >Christ should never have been sacrificed?
> > >> >Kind of creates a little problem with your theology, don't you think?
>
> > >> Remember that the theology of Christianity tells us that God is a
> > >> sociopath.
>
> > >I always thought she was a frustrated paranoid scitzo megolomaniac
> > >with a serious inferiority complex and tendencies towards manic-
> > >depression.
>
> > Okay, but that leads to sociopathic behavior. Lucky for religionists,
> > God doesn't exist, since the stories about God tell us that God was
> > responsible for more deaths than Stalin, Hitler and Mao combined.
>
> > > The hypothetic god thing isn't human, so there's no
> > >reason it should see humans as "people", so the sociopath diagnosis is
> > >no more valid than for a tiger that kills someone.
>
> > More like a person who collects kittens to drown them.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Well, all you are doing is saying that God is guilty of murder every
> time a natural death occurs.  I do not think you will get far with
> that idea.
> Robert B. Winn

Why not when you always say that god is every way all the time?