🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 08:29:32 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote
in alt.atheism:

>On Jul 4, 3:06�am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>> > On Jul 3, 5:32?pm, "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:9fadb87c-6364-49eb-9ca6-c8fd555f6cd3@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>> >> On Jul 3, 6:05?am, "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>> >>>news:f807e4d0-b40f-4cb8-bb4c-12f00021898d@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>> >>> Well, the scriptures say that the wicked would be more miserable in
>> >>> the presence of God than with the devils in hell.
>> >>> ===========
>> >>> In other words, since we are all sinful by definition, the smart choice is
>> >>> to aim for hell in the first place. ?Nice morality ....
>> >> No, the smart choice is to repent of sins. ?However, atheists claim
>> >> that nothing they do is sin, so they are not going to repent.
>>
>> >> ==========
>>
>> >> Sin is a social construct. ?It exists irrespective of the god(s) worshipped
>> >> ... or not, as the case may be.
>>
>> > Well, there is no sin in heaven. �Maybe that is why atheists do not
>> > want to go there.
>>
>> It's more true to say that by removing what you loosely term sin, you
>> arrive at a place you loosely call heaven.
>>
>> However it is only one point on a certain map: there are many other
>> places to visit..
>>
>> As the Jewish mystics were well aware..
>>
>>
>Well, for instance, you could visit hell.  Why anyone would want to
>visit hell, I do not know.

No, that is not possible. Hell does not exist.