🚀 go-pugleaf

On 4 Jun, 20:32, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 4, 11:23 am, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
> > mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Jun 4, 6:14 am, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
> > >> mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>> On Jun 2, 10:42 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> > >>>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 22:50:25 -0700 (PDT),
> > >>>> mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>>>> On Jun 2, 9:44 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:33:57 -0700 (PDT),
> > >>>>>> mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On Jun 2, 2:30 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:13:39 -0700 (PDT),
> > >>>>>>>> mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 8:48 am, John Locke <johnlocke98...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 22:33:45 -0700 (PDT),
> > >>>>>>>>>> mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> "I want to know how God created the universe. All the rest are just
> > >>>>>>>>>>> details." Albert Einstein
> > >>>>>>>>>> He wasn't referring to the "God" your thinking about. He was talking
> > >>>>>>>>>> about nature. Einstein had no personal "God".
> > >>>>>>>>> Wrong.
> > >>>>>>>> What part of Einstein's direct statement "I do not believe in a
> > >>>>>>>> personal God" eluded you?
> > >>>>>>>>> He was refering to his Creator.
> > >>>>>>>> Which to Einstein, was "Spinoza's God"; an impersonal underlying order
> > >>>>>>>> to nature. The idea of an actual, conscious, self-aware creator deity,
> > >>>>>>>> was a notion that Einstein found ridiculous to the end of his life,
> > >>>>>>>> your outright lies notwithstanding.
> > >>>>>>>>> Since nature can't create
> > >>>>>>>>> itself.
> > >>>>>>>> Says who? And why not?
> > >>>>>>> NO. Moron
> > >>>>>> Incoherent much?- Hide quoted text -
> > >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> > >>>>> If you start with zero and add zeros you get nothing. The Big Bang was
> > >>>>> zero.
> > >>>> Google "quantum fluctuation".- Hide quoted text -
> > >>>> - Show quoted text -
> > >>> Quantum fluctuations happen at every point in space and at all points
> > >>> in time. This turns space-time solid.
> > >> And yet it doesn't...- Hide quoted text -
> > >> - Show quoted text -
> > > NO quantum fluctuations without making space-time solid.
> > And yet, you're still wrong...
> Prove it!
> Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008.

So, when did time start, boyo, geo, bio, sci, ... , and
hyperdimensionally? Surely not the latter! And when does it stop? The
Rapture?
--
'foolsrushin.'