Article View: sci.physics
Article #14447Re: Original motion at the Big Bang
From: mitchgrav
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:02
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:02
32 lines
3196 bytes
3196 bytes
On Feb 15, 1:36 pm, "foolsrushin." <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On 14 Feb, 03:39, mitchg...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > Albert Einstein said: I want to know how God created this universe. > > All the rest are just details. > > When matter was created at the beginning of the universe I believe it > > started to move due to its own force. Its freefall imediately set it > > into motion. In other words: there was no absolute rest as Einstein > > alluded to. > > The original expansion was inflation which quickly spread matter apart > > so that gravity would not recollapse the Big Bang in a Big Fall. > > Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 > > And what was there, before the beginning of the Universe/ Multiverse, > Bang or no Bang! It seems to me that both empirically and logically we > are confronted with isoluble regressions, though, of course, locally, > at least, most of our math and physics seems to work and be > productive, so you are right to raise problems and paradoxes in > connexion with either. But what lies, if anything, beyond our island > of mathematical physics, lies, it would seem to me, beyond our grasp! > Roger Penroses's 'The Emperoror's New Mind' is worth a visit, if only > because it blocks so many glib (mostly implicit: we know) metaphysical > solutions, yet it is a Chinese dinner, and you find yourself raiding > the fridge in the middle of the night! > -- > 'foolsrushin.' There is no multiverse. There is only one universe. It is Einstein's closed universe with a beginning and an infinite future for us. There was no before the beginning of time. Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7564f0aa-266b-4dd0-8e49-f6b665dacf1a@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3890f2f9-3bef-4013-b037-b2db88ad854d@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <682e7b21-7d91-4984-b5be-33d1e398617f@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,f25328d167c92279 X-Google-Thread: 10f545,f25328d167c92279 X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,f25328d167c92279 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,735e10fd4207bff8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid10f545,gid106b5d,gid102f53,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: mitchgrav@hotmail.com Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,rec.org.mensa,cam.misc Subject: Re: Original motion at the Big Bang Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:02:20 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 32 Message-ID: <7564f0aa-266b-4dd0-8e49-f6b665dacf1a@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com> References: <3890f2f9-3bef-4013-b037-b2db88ad854d@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <682e7b21-7d91-4984-b5be-33d1e398617f@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.175.17.18 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1203112940 7368 127.0.0.1 (15 Feb 2008 22:02:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.175.17.18; posting-account=NzomCgoAAADSxo8dItZFimQE_f4Fbqcn User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)