🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #14447

Re: Original motion at the Big Bang

#14447
From: mitchgrav
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:02
32 lines
3196 bytes
On Feb 15, 1:36 pm, "foolsrushin." <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 Feb, 03:39, mitchg...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > Albert Einstein said: I want to know how God created this universe.
> > All the rest are just details.
> > When matter was created at the beginning of the universe I believe it
> > started to move due to its own force. Its freefall imediately set it
> > into motion. In other words: there was no absolute rest as Einstein
> > alluded to.
> > The original expansion was inflation which quickly spread matter apart
> > so that gravity would not recollapse the Big Bang in a Big Fall.
> > Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
>
> And what was there, before the beginning of the Universe/ Multiverse,
> Bang or no Bang! It seems to me that both empirically and logically we
> are confronted with isoluble regressions, though, of course, locally,
> at least, most of our math and physics seems to work and be
> productive, so you are right to raise problems and paradoxes in
> connexion with either. But what lies, if anything, beyond our island
> of mathematical physics, lies, it would seem to me, beyond our grasp!
> Roger Penroses's 'The Emperoror's New Mind' is worth a visit, if only
> because it blocks so many glib (mostly implicit: we know) metaphysical
> solutions, yet it is a Chinese dinner, and you find yourself raiding
> the fridge in the middle of the night!
> --
> 'foolsrushin.'

There is no multiverse. There is only one universe. It is Einstein's
closed universe with a beginning and an infinite future for us. There
was no before the beginning of time.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7564f0aa-266b-4dd0-8e49-f6b665dacf1a@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <3890f2f9-3bef-4013-b037-b2db88ad854d@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <682e7b21-7d91-4984-b5be-33d1e398617f@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,f25328d167c92279
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,f25328d167c92279
X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,f25328d167c92279
X-Google-Thread: 102f53,735e10fd4207bff8
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid10f545,gid106b5d,gid102f53,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: mitchgrav@hotmail.com
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,rec.org.mensa,cam.misc
Subject: Re: Original motion at the Big Bang
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:02:20 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <7564f0aa-266b-4dd0-8e49-f6b665dacf1a@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: <3890f2f9-3bef-4013-b037-b2db88ad854d@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> 
 <682e7b21-7d91-4984-b5be-33d1e398617f@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.175.17.18
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1203112940 7368 127.0.0.1 (15 Feb 2008 22:02:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:02:20 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.175.17.18; 
 posting-account=NzomCgoAAADSxo8dItZFimQE_f4Fbqcn
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; 
 .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)