🚀 go-pugleaf

I guess POOF City at Venus L2(VL2) is merely somewhat interesting if
not more than a touch cool, though having little if anything to do
with the daunting task of relocating our terribly nearby and otherwise
massive orb that's so physically dark and salty, as our pesky GW
causing mascon of a moon, as for getting dragged all the way out to
Earth's L1 for accomplishing a little badly needed shade and otherwise
moderating our various tidal considerations (inside and out of our
98.5% fluid Earth) by roughly 50%.

BTW  Within the regular laws of physics, creating solar isolation via
moon isn't nearly as hocus-pocus as having supposedly walked on that
gamma and hard-Xray nasty moon of ours that's capable of becoming 8 to
10 fold worse off than having to survive within any Van Allen
badlands.  Put it this way;  our trusty and somewhat salty old moon is
never less reactive than and certainly never without the electrostatic
grasp of all that's solar and cosmic which our magnetosphere deflects
and otherwise holds onto.

Too bad that our best science and those regular laws of physics hasn't
a freaking clue as to how much terrestrial trauma that moon of ours
has been causing inside and out of our 98.5% fluid Earth.  Too bad
that our moon's L1 zone is still so taboo/nondisclosure rated (perhaps
China or even India can help fix that).
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth


On May 1, 7:14 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's supposedly taking the equivalent of 2e20 joules, or roughly the
> equal of 7.2e21 KW worth of gravity force(Fg), as for representing the
> equivalent in centripetal force(Fc) of mutually holding onto our moon,
> or perhaps its actually a little of vise versa.
>
> How much of that energy budget is getting transferred into Earth? (<
> 7.2e21 KW ?)
>
> How about allowing 0.0001% of just 1/6th = 1.2e15 KW
> That's only 2.347 KW/m2, or rather a wussy 1.1075e-3 W/m3 [excluding
> our atmosphere], or perhaps as little a 1.1 mw/m3 including the volume
> of our wet atmosphere) seems rather insignificant, doesn't it.
>
> Gravity has certainly been one of those real measured forces, and the
> associated energy of that force is clearly going to/from somewhere
> other than into thin air (sort of speak).  Much of earth's surface and
> especially of its interior is not a solid, and of such fluid stuff
> (including our polluted and wet atmosphere) is affected by and thus
> moved along by those unavoidable interactions of the moon's gravity,
> of which is causing all sorts of friction.
>
> Earth's moon is considerably more than a thousand fold of greater mass
> per ratio of it's planet than any other moon within oursolarsystem,
> with the exception of those icy little binary planets or the likes of
> Oort cloud debris that simply arnt all that robust to start with, and
> much less the least bit internally fluid, whereas our moon is
> certainly close by and fast moving enough to having a significant
> tidal impact (inside and out) upon our environment.
>
> Then we have our moon's (IR)radiance = ? w/m2
> Like a mirror that's better at reflecting IR photons (certainly way
> better than Earth's albedo that's supposedly contributing a total IR
> planetshine worth of 266 w/m2 [with hardly any of those FIR photons to
> spare}, whereas that naked and physically dark moon is unavoidably
> creating those secondary/recoil worthy FIR photons, is why there's a
> fairly substantial IR/FIR terrestrial influx that's measurably good
> for having contributed a little something of extra applied energy into
> our GW situation. (too bad we still haven't established a moon L1
> science platform for actively telling us this essential information)
>
> In the past I've often asked the question;  are we being global warmed
> to death by our moon?
>
> In more ways than not, I believe the regular laws of physics and of
> the best available science has been telling us the truth, that in fact
> we are being warmed to death by our moon that has only been with us
> since the last ice age this planet will ever see.
>
> Too bad we're not ever going to get ourselves smart enough for
> relocating that nasty moon of ours out to Earth's L1, for
> accomplishing such moderation of that pesky tidal force, and for
> otherwise obtaining shade to burn (sort of speak), and we could still
> have the LSE-CM/ISS along with its nifty tether dipole element hosting
> the best NEO diverting laser cannon, plus loads of nifty Star Wars
> stuff to boot.
> -
> Brad Guth