Article View: sci.physics
Article #14453Re: How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
From: BradGuth
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:30
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:30
45 lines
3485 bytes
3485 bytes
On Jun 17, 5:55 pm, The Ghost In The Machine <e...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote: > In sci.physics, Art Deco > <e...@caballista.org> > wrote > on Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:37:21 -0600 > <170620071237213172%e...@caballista.org>: > > > BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>I guess POOF City at Venus L2(VL2) is > > > another one of your goofy ideas, Vern. > > Maybe so, but it's theoretically possible; we've launched > a few things to Venus. The idea's practicality and its > fundability (is that a word?) are of course very open > questions. Notice how our Art Fucko altered the topic crossposting, from "sci.physics, alt.astronomy, sci.astro, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, cam.misc" to his "sci.physics, alt.astronomy.art-deco, alt.astronomy, sci.astro, alt.usenet.kooks", so that their Zion cesspool group could include it within their sick Third Reich realm of perpetual naysayism. Art is a born-again Zion fuckologest, all the rusemaster way to putting one of their own kind on a stick without a stitch of remorse, and forcing WWIII if necessary. In spite of all the Zion gauntlet of infomercial spewing flak, POOF City at the relatively cool location of VL2 has been entirely doable. At far less than 10% the ongoing cost of collateral damage and carnage of the innocent (mostly Muslims), whereas the likes of POOF City (5+ POOF units plus their shuttle craft) would have been a done deal as of more than a decade ago. Of course our moon's L1 for eventually accommodating the likes of "Clarke Station" and that of my LSE-CM/ISS should have been doable as of nearly four decades ago, from which all sorts of highly energy efficient deployments of various missions could have been launched, including POOF City as intended for VL2. - "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell - Brad Guth
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1182130235.064296.33950@q19g2000prn.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q19g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1178072047.983654.313060@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <1182097559.730326.6540@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <170620071237213172%erfc@caballista.org> <ho1hk4-6lv.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: fdc67,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gidfdc67,gidf74ae,gid1038c2,gid102f53,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q19g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.astronomy,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,cam.misc Subject: Re: How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for? Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:30:35 -0000 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 46 Message-ID: <1182130235.064296.33950@q19g2000prn.googlegroups.com> References: <1178072047.983654.313060@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <1182097559.730326.6540@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <170620071237213172%erfc@caballista.org> <ho1hk4-6lv.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.91.99.228 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1182130235 22755 127.0.0.1 (18 Jun 2007 01:30:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:30:35 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <ho1hk4-6lv.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; MSN 2.5; Windows 98; T312461),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: q19g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.91.99.228; posting-account=zEXP4w0AAAAJ5s7atsfc5JlL--hpDELy