🚀 go-pugleaf

On May 23, 12:00 am, The Ghost In The Machine
<e...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote:
> In sci.physics, BradGuth
> <bradg...@gmail.com>
>  wrote
> on 20 May 2007 10:03:40 -0700
> <1179680620.643558.83...@b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com>:
>
>
> > On May 19, 11:22 am, gb6726 <gb6...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> 20 Global Cooling Inventions.
>
> >>www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/index.htm
> >> (still under editing)
>
> > Moving our moon out to Earth's L1 still isn't one of those inventions.
>
> > At least my invention for cooling off mother Earth would actually
> > work, and then some.
>
> > I even know of how to accomplish the daunting task of moving that big
> > old nasty and still somewhat salty damn moon of ours.
> > -
> >BradGuth
>
> It might, but you'll need something a little bigger than
> a bulldozer to shove the Moon out of orbit.
>
> In fact, you'll need two somethings, aimed at the moon
> and hitting it at exactly the right times.  The concept
> of a "free-travel transit orbit" is well known to NASA --
> such are routinely done in order to get to other planets.
> The general idea is to have an ellipse with perihelion
> at Earth and aphelion at the target planet, if it's an
> outer planet; aphelion is at Earth and perihelion at
> one's destination if one is going to Venus or Mercury.
> At the other end of the eclipse, the second burn ensues,
> circularizing the orbit.
>
> Since we don't have a rocket engine quite big enough to
> do the job (the Moon is after all 73.5 quintillion metric
> tonnes), we direct two little somethings from the Oort cloud
> and hope for the best.
>
> At least, such is my understanding of your proposal.
>
> --
> #191, ewi...@earthlink.net
> Linux.  Because life's too short for a buggy OS.
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

You obviously have no such understanding of my proposal.

You just don't get it.  Using the efficient tug of mass in order to
move a much greater mass is obviously way over your naysay head.

Don't need any stinking big-ass rocket engines, or those impactors
from our Oort cloud.  As I'd said before, given a good supercomputer
and of its fully interactive orbital physics software is all that I'll
need, plus a spare trillion dollars per year for roughly the next
century.  Got a problem with any of that?
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell