Article View: sci.physics
Article #14501Re: How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
From: BradGuth
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 18:24
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 18:24
108 lines
7386 bytes
7386 bytes
There's no question that VL2 POOF City is 100% doable as is. However, Venus itself is looking better and better all the time. It seems that our wet and otherwise 98.5% fluid Earth is not just a very rare planet, whereas it's also rather dumbfounded about getting summarily global warmed to death by our local mascon/moon, plus receiving all the warm and fuzzy GW benefits of humanity running itself amuck. For a little friendly terrestrial reminder: Total ice melt = 80.32 meters + given a little extra on behalf of a thermal expansion factor and continued erosion filling in for perhaps another 20% boost. http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs2-00/ Here's an even better global warming test: (can you folks swim and survive upon jellyfish?) Of local planetology and a salty old mascon of a moon that's not going away soon enough, is all about utilizing the best available science and of those educated minds to the maximum extent possible. Or we could keep telling ourselves those same old lies upon lies, and otherwise believing in the tooth fairy after we elect Sponge Bob Square Pants as our next LLPOF president. With such an educational and science obtainable goal for relocating our moon out to Earth's L1, as such this daunting task would actually provide many direct environmental benefits, that is if it were not for the ongoing Old Testament faith-based gauntlet of insurmountable naysayism and otherwise mainstream damage-control fornication that's in denial of their being in denial, such as our NASA/Apollo wizardly need of their covering thy infomercial spewing moonsuit butts. In addition to all of our human contributed atmospheric deployed soot, pushing the h2o content of our sooty and CO2 enhanced atmosphere from 100 teratonnes to more than 200 teratonnes, the artificial shifting of Earth's surface albedo in the wrong damn direction is simply going to further expedite the ongoing demise of humanity, that's obviously still far too snookered and thus easily dumbfounded past the point of no return. Unfortunately, most folks within Usenet have been working their infomercial butts off, in serious overtime at keeping this bad situation going in the worse possible direction. The humanly forced and clearly negative going shift of Earth's albedo, by way of diving off the deep end of subtracting merely one percentage point, is yet another real environment killer to the thermal balance of our Earth that's keeping itself more and more clouded throughout a wetter and stormier nighttime that's only getting rid of perhaps little more than 90% of that extra absorbed insolation worth of energy. Of course, more than a few others and certainly I've only been sharing that interpretation for several years, along with sharing many other honest thoughts about my global warming moon that's not exactly helping us to survive upon our 98.5% fluid Earth, as in not helping one damn bit because of the unavoidable gravity/tidal friction taking place within and all about our fluid Earth. You see, true geology and thus honest planetology or perhaps even local interstellar cosmology is not about what you or I can see, such as noticing such bad weather extremes that's only getting worse, and of ocean risings plus tidal flows that are accomplishing more collateral damage than good, whereas 98.5% or more of our global environment is essentially fluid to those forces contributed by our pesky mascon/moon and even from a solar tidal influence, of having been contributing to what goes all the way to the very molten core of this planet that's also in the process of losing it's magnetosphere at the impressive rate of -.05%/year (if that factor alone isn't bad enough news, then perhaps nothing is). It seems our very own brown-nosed clowns of conditional physics and skewed science are in fact running us amuck (on behalf of the rich getting a whole lot richer), whereas this time our supposed best available science (aka junk science of mostly infomercial hyped disinformation) and of their faith-based puppeteers has in fact managed to shoot off both of our two left feet, and then some. Of course, the likes of our Death Valley at -86 meters, the Great Basin at -105 meters (aka most of Nevada), and even that of our Grand Canyon would soon enough become massive salt water holding basins, along with incorporating most all of Salt Lake City and multiple other old and dried up salt basins becoming wet and thus albedo dark instead of a salty near white. The good within GW news being, Venus is looking a whole lot better all the time. At least on Venus there's unlimited renewable energy to burn, sort of speak, and you certainly don't have to buy off those pesky wetland or CO2 credits. Since relocating our moon out to Earth's L1 is not likely to ever happen (because we're simply not smart enough for making such happen), perhaps my VL2 POOF City should be accomplished before we have even fewer options. - http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/start.html LLPOF Question 3: Global Warming is believed to be caused primarily by: b) orbital eccentricities of Earth and variations in the Sun's output That is correct! (that is actually a well proven lie) Our GW toasty environment that's going somewhat postal is primarily caused by our moon that has only been with us since the last ice age this badly polluted planet will ever see. It is NOT caused primarily by any 11 year solar cycle and/or that of our elliptical orbit. Of extra water vapor being sustained within our humanly sooty atmosphere is in fact a secondary result of the primary GW that's caused by our moon. Going from 100 teratonnes to that of 200+ teratonnes of atmospheric h2o that's extra loaded and/or fortified along with our soot and artificial CO2 is not exactly a good sign. - Brad Guth
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1179080694.211453.40060@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1178072047.983654.313060@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: fdc67,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gidfdc67,gidf74ae,gid1038c2,gid102f53,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.astronomy,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,cam.misc Subject: Re: How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for? Date: 13 May 2007 11:24:54 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 109 Message-ID: <1179080694.211453.40060@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> References: <1178072047.983654.313060@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.91.99.75 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1179080694 28854 127.0.0.1 (13 May 2007 18:24:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 18:24:54 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1178072047.983654.313060@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; MSN 2.5; Windows 98; T312461),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.91.99.75; posting-account=zEXP4w0AAAAJ5s7atsfc5JlL--hpDELy