Article View: sci.physics
Article #14500Re: How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
From: BradGuth
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 04:23
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 04:23
49 lines
4094 bytes
4094 bytes
It's all about sustaining and/or improving the quality of life. If that motive on behalf of salvaging our environment takes on the form of accomplishing my LSE-CM/ISS, or that of my VL2 POOF City as part of the ultimate game plan, while our moon is gradually getting relocated to Earth's L1, then so be it. As to the perfectly valid argument(s) or honest topic jest of artificially blocking out a little more than a sufficient portion of our sun, as such is all about sustaining and/or improving the quality of all life. The best I can accomplish thus far, is coming up with the new and improved sun + (moon at Earth L1) as becoming worth 50.4% of our existing lunar tide. A 50% reduction in tidal action is perhaps a little less important to ocean and other terrestrial life than we've been giving it credit. Most tidal life can adapt, some of which getting by with a little of our best intelligent design as help wherever necessary. This moon relocation process of getting that mascon situated out to Earth's L1 (roughly 4X further away than it's current orbital trek) is going to take a good century or more, and therefore I'm not imposing an overnight change to whatever terrestrial life that we know of that's attached its life endurance to that existing lunar cycle and ocean tidal issues. There will be some unfortunate extinctions of life which simply can not adapt, though hopefully humanity will not become one of those. However, at the very same time, other existing species that are currently finding it downright difficult or nearly impossible to survive as is, as such will likely bloom or otherwise better populate under the conditions of having less terrestrial trauma to deal with. A measured reduction in global warming (in good part due to the solar isolation afforded by the moon itself), along with having accomplished much less gravity/tidal trauma taking place (inside and out), is what should by rights benefit most all known species of life on Earth (hopefully just short of bringing on another ice age). What we honestly need for this daunting task is having that spendy supercomputer running all of its parallel CPUs off the charts, doing exactly whatever's necessary for figuring out what's doable, and otherwise telling us whatever else needs to be avoided at all cost. If you should happen to have such supercomputer access, and wouldn't terribly mind running off a few of these weird ideas, as such I'd like to see a few of those what-if results in 3D animation. - Brad Guth
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1179203011.795212.311560@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1178072047.983654.313060@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <1179159884.059033.21090@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: fdc67,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,8a07395a31c570d7 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gidfdc67,gidf74ae,gid1038c2,gid102f53,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.astronomy,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,cam.misc Subject: Re: How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for? Date: 14 May 2007 21:23:31 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 50 Message-ID: <1179203011.795212.311560@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> References: <1178072047.983654.313060@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <1179159884.059033.21090@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.91.99.207 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1179203013 2668 127.0.0.1 (15 May 2007 04:23:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 04:23:33 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1179159884.059033.21090@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; MSN 2.5; Windows 98; T312461),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.91.99.207; posting-account=zEXP4w0AAAAJ5s7atsfc5JlL--hpDELy