🚀 go-pugleaf

On Feb 5, 12:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 1:53 pm, Victor Porton <por...@narod.ru> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I have the following rough idea:
>
> > Suppose some kind of time machine exists (it may be e.g. two connected
> > moving blackholes with wormhole between).
>
> > Suppose somebody want to use it to travel in the past when he was a
> > child and kill himself in the childhood.
>
> > If he would do it it would violate basic principles.
>
> > So something necessarily would disturb him to do it.
>
> > It looks like that the force which would disturb him to do it shall be
> > very clever. I suspect that this way we would deduce existence of God.
>
> > Can we put it in rigorous mathematical formulas, such as requiring
> > existence in physical reality a function which could solve any math
> > problem on its input? (We may think about a mathematician borrowing a
> > theorem from the future, so that there would be no man who proved the
> > theorem first, or something similar to find such a solving function, I
> > suspect.)
>
> > Also I suspect that something similar may be deduced from existence of
> > faster-than-light quantum teleportation (because it violated the
> > principle of causality in the sense of Relativity Theory).
>
> > So, can anybody formulate these physical theories in exact formulas
> > (about a "solving any problems" physical function)?
>
> First of all, it does no good to suppose something that violates known
> laws of physics. If an event violates the laws of physics, then it
> won't happen, and that's not because something clever stopped it.
>
> Likewise, there is no such thing as a perpetual motion machine,
> because that violates some laws of physics. This doesn't mean that
> something clever has stepped in to keep a perpetual motion machine
> from working.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Slow time takes you into the future of the universe (more rapidly.)

Mitch Raemsch