Article View: sci.physics
Article #14825Re: ARE ELECTRONS PHYSICAL ENTITIES?
From: tnlockyer
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:42
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:42
45 lines
3233 bytes
3233 bytes
On Jul 26, 5:09 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jul 25, 1:10 am, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote: > > > > > > > ARE ELECTRONS PHYSICAL ENTITIES? > > If an electron is a physical matter-/energy ‘particle’ then it MUST > > have a maybe not definite mean geometrical extension. > > > THE STANDARD-MODEL IS NOT ULTIMATE, MAYBE WRONG? > > It is in the not ultimate standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’ > > that an electron is described without a physical geometrical > > extension. > > In the standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’ the electron is > > described as a ‘point-particle’ that have been given AD HOC physical > > properties as mass, electric charge, spin, magnetic moment etc. > > > It must be time experimentally to discover the ‘true’ nature of the > > electron! > > > Best regards > > Louis Nielsen > > Denmark > > An electron is a fundamental point particle whos energy is infinitely > dense because as a point it is infinitely small. Its energy is a C^2 > concentration. With motion it goes above C^2 by the Gamma factor. > > Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008- Hide quoted text - Mitch, we now know the electron is not a point particle; See; http://www.members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf Note that all of the electron's measured fundamental physical constants can only be calculaed from a closed electromagnetic stricture. Regards, Tom http://www.amazon.com/Fundamental-Physical-Constants-Geometric-Structures/dp/096315463X
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<885efc94-fd7b-4296-bd60-7c6e13e45620@u36g2000pro.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!u36g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<bc9db64a-998d-4941-8ea0-1c40949c1048@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <ad9de963-640d-484e-af0e-c35f3a9e43e0@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b9272b5062dfff78 X-Google-Thread: 104f62,b9272b5062dfff78 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid104f62,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!u36g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "tnlockyer@aol.com" <tnlockyer@aol.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,dk.videnskab Subject: Re: ARE ELECTRONS PHYSICAL ENTITIES? Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:42:30 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 46 Message-ID: <885efc94-fd7b-4296-bd60-7c6e13e45620@u36g2000pro.googlegroups.com> References: <bc9db64a-998d-4941-8ea0-1c40949c1048@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <ad9de963-640d-484e-af0e-c35f3a9e43e0@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.200.116.201 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217198551 3915 127.0.0.1 (27 Jul 2008 22:42:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u36g2000pro.googlegroups.com; posting-host=207.200.116.201; posting-account=1J9nkwoAAACHRuOsHyA6gZVrV-47r1XA User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.1; AOLBuild 4334.34; Windows NT 6.0; SV1; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.1.5 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 spider-ntc-ta04.proxy.aol.com[CFC87004] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1 cache-ntc-ad07.proxy.aol.com[CFC874C9] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])