🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 27, 3:42 pm, "tnlock...@aol.com" <tnlock...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 5:09 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 25, 1:10 am, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>
> > > ARE ELECTRONS PHYSICAL ENTITIES?
> > > If an electron is a physical matter-/energy ‘particle’ then it MUST
> > > have a maybe not definite mean geometrical extension.
>
> > > THE STANDARD-MODEL IS NOT ULTIMATE, MAYBE WRONG?
> > > It is in the not ultimate standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’
> > > that an electron is described without a physical geometrical
> > > extension.
> > > In the standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’ the electron is
> > > described as a ‘point-particle’ that have been given AD HOC physical
> > > properties as mass, electric charge, spin, magnetic moment etc.
>
> > > It must be time experimentally to discover the ‘true’ nature of the
> > > electron!
>
> > > Best regards
> > > Louis Nielsen
> > > Denmark
>
> > An electron is a fundamental point particle whos energy is infinitely
> > dense because as  a point it is infinitely small. Its energy is a C^2
> > concentration. With motion it goes above C^2 by the Gamma factor.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008- Hide quoted text -
>
> Mitch, we now know the electron is not a point particle;  See;
>
> http://www.members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf
>
> Note that all of the electron's measured fundamental physical
> constants can only be calculaed from a closed electromagnetic
> stricture.
>
> Regards, Tom

I'm on Dial-up, and in canuckistan, so I get bytes/minute.
Would someone else please recommend Tom's pdf
above, so I can take the time to download it.
TIA
Ken