🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Jul25.180106.5023@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) writes:

>     Gee, Greg.  Once again you insist on implying that these
>     objections have been *successfully* addressed rather than
>     making the arguments yourself.  Is this simply laziness, or
>     is it a realization that the counterarguments are weak? 

I'm sorry Dale, but I don't claim to be an expert on hydrogen storage
in metal lattices. I'm just pointing out references in the literature.
That's how science gets done, you know, by publishing in the
literature, not by arguing on Usenet. If you think that reading the
literature is laziness, then I can't help you.

>     P.S.  exploding hydrogen is a wonderful topic for this newsgroup.

If you're curious about the results, they have developed hydrogen
storage containers that can be punctured, crushed, and otherwise
dismembered (i.e. shot with high-power rifles) without exploding. I'm
sorry that you can't take a few minutes out of your busy schedule to
read about it.

Again, I'd suggest another newsgroup if you wish to continue your
massive flamewar on these issues.