Article View: sci.physics
Article #1485Re: ZERO Nuclear impact (was: Is car pooling for real? etc)
From: Cameron Randale Bass
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 19:26
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 19:26
50 lines
3070 bytes
3070 bytes
In article <1992Jul25.183038.5345@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) writes:
>In article <1992Jul25.180106.5023@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) writes:
>
>> Gee, Greg. Once again you insist on implying that these
>> objections have been *successfully* addressed rather than
>> making the arguments yourself. Is this simply laziness, or
>> is it a realization that the counterarguments are weak?
>
>I'm sorry Dale, but I don't claim to be an expert on hydrogen storage
>in metal lattices. I'm just pointing out references in the literature.
>That's how science gets done, you know, by publishing in the
>literature, not by arguing on Usenet. If you think that reading the
>literature is laziness, then I can't help you.
Weak counterargument. Economics comes in to the storage of
hydrogen in this fashion. It would be much cheaper just to
pull methane out of the ground (or crude oil for that manner)
than to use solar of any form to separate water to be
transported around in hydrogen-containing metals. In fact
if one insists on doing things this way, it is cheaper to
build a large nuclear plant to do the electrolysis, eliminating
solar entirely.
>> P.S. exploding hydrogen is a wonderful topic for this newsgroup.
>
>If you're curious about the results, they have developed hydrogen
>storage containers that can be punctured, crushed, and otherwise
>dismembered (i.e. shot with high-power rifles) without exploding. I'm
>sorry that you can't take a few minutes out of your busy schedule to
>read about it.
For my work, we'll have a D2 container that will not be crushable
even if one dropped the loading crane on it. That does not
make it viable and economically feasable for using in
a 'hydrogen economy'.
>Again, I'd suggest another newsgroup if you wish to continue your
>massive flamewar on these issues.
You may continue the flamewar you started in any group you feel
necessary. Usually, I'll just stick to making and rebutting
arguments presented.
dale bass
--
C. R. Bass crb7q@virginia.edu
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia (804) 924-7926
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul25.192603.5892@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!gatech!concert!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7qReferences:
<1992Jul25.174836.4853@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Jul25.180106.5023@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Jul25.183038.5345@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!gatech!concert!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7q From: crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: ZERO Nuclear impact (was: Is car pooling for real? etc) Message-ID: <1992Jul25.192603.5892@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Date: 25 Jul 92 19:26:03 GMT References: <1992Jul25.174836.4853@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Jul25.180106.5023@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Jul25.183038.5345@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: University of Virginia Lines: 50