Article View: sci.physics
Article #14894Re: Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub-particles
From: Y.Porat
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:58
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:58
57 lines
3274 bytes
3274 bytes
On Sep 29, 10:16 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote: > Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub- > particles. > > By Louis Nielsen, Treatise:http://www.rostra.dk/louis > > What is the physical interpretation of Einstein's equation E = m*c^2 > where E is the latent energy inside a portion of matter with the mass > m and where c is the velocity of light? > > In my treatise I show that m*c^2 is equal to the total kinetic > energies of the sub-particles I call Unitons and of which all matter > consists. > > The Uniton Postulate: > The unitons are the smallest and most fundamental energy-/matter > quanta in the Universe. > All matter consists of unitons and all interactions in the Universe > are consequences of > interacting unitons. > > In my treatise I show that the total latent energy E inside a given > amount of matter with mass m is given by E = m*c^2 where c is the > velocity of light. And the expression m*c^2 is a measure of the TOTAL > KINETIC ENERGY OF THE UNITONS of which the matter consists. > Kinetic energy is the most fundamental form of energy. > > By the above recognition of our physical world it is not difficult to > understand that all matter, > regardless of its chemical appearance contains energy as given by > Einstein's famous equation. > > Read more in section 13 and section 14 of my treatise: http://www.rostra.dk/louis > > Best regards > Louis Nielsen > Denmark ------------ very nice and right but that is not an orriginal idea of yourse i am preaching along yerars and it is endlessly documented innet documents there now you didnt mension that it showes that even photons has rest mass that is in movement you called it Unitins i called it 'Circlons' now i ddint see your site and i wonder if you got to thje concusion that i got that this basic particle MUST MOVE NATURALLY IN A CLOSED CIRCLE !!?? ATB Y.Porat ----------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1191124686.823824.50550@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1191097008.504157.39250@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,6def8a3356d8cb3 X-Google-Thread: 104f62,6def8a3356d8cb3 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid104f62,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,dk.videnskab Subject: Re: Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub-particles Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:58:06 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 59 Message-ID: <1191124686.823824.50550@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> References: <1191097008.504157.39250@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.68.182.98 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1191124687 11151 127.0.0.1 (30 Sep 2007 03:58:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:58:07 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1191097008.504157.39250@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.68.182.98; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0