🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #14895

Re: Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub-particles

#14895
From: franklinhu
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:43
48 lines
3120 bytes
On Sep 29, 1:16 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>        Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub-
> particles.
>
> By Louis Nielsen,   Treatise:http://www.rostra.dk/louis
>
> What is the physical interpretation of Einstein's equation E = m*c^2
> where E is the latent energy inside a portion of matter with the mass
> m and where c is the velocity of light?
>
> In my treatise I show that m*c^2 is equal to the total kinetic
> energies of the sub-particles I call Unitons and of which all matter
> consists.
>
> The Uniton Postulate:
> The unitons are the smallest and most fundamental energy-/matter
> quanta in the Universe.
> All matter consists of unitons and all interactions in the Universe
> are consequences of
> interacting unitons.
>
> In my treatise I show that the total latent energy E inside a given
> amount of matter with mass m is given by E = m*c^2 where c is the
> velocity of light. And the expression m*c^2 is a measure of the TOTAL
> KINETIC ENERGY OF THE UNITONS of which the matter consists.
> Kinetic energy is the most fundamental form of energy.
>
> By the above recognition of our physical world it is not difficult to
> understand that all matter,
> regardless of its chemical appearance contains energy as given by
> Einstein's famous equation.
>
> Read more in section 13 and section 14 of my treatise:  http://www.rostra.dk/louis
>
> Best regards
> Louis Nielsen
> Denmark

It's actually a lot easier than that. E=mc^2 because it is the sum of
the kinetic energies of the particles ejected during pair production
of a positron and electron. E = 1/2 mv^2 + 1/2 mv^2 = mv^2 where v=c
and m = mass of positron and electron.

See: What Does E=mc^2 Really Mean?

http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/emc.html

fhuemc
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1191131033.333749.146970@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1191097008.504157.39250@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,6def8a3356d8cb3
X-Google-Thread: 104f62,6def8a3356d8cb3
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid104f62,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  franklinhu@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: sci.physics,dk.videnskab
Subject: Re: Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub-particles
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:43:53 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <1191131033.333749.146970@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
References: <1191097008.504157.39250@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.170.54.42
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1191131033 1143 127.0.0.1 (30 Sep 2007 05:43:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:43:53 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1191097008.504157.39250@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.170.54.42;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0