🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 29, 4:16 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>        Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub-
> particles.
>
> By Louis Nielsen,   Treatise:http://www.rostra.dk/louis
>
> What is the physical interpretation of Einstein's equation E = m*c^2
> where E is the latent energy inside a portion of matter with the mass
> m and where c is the velocity of light?
>
> In my treatise I show that m*c^2 is equal to the total kinetic
> energies of the sub-particles I call Unitons and of which all matter
> consists.
>
> The Uniton Postulate:
> The unitons are the smallest and most fundamental energy-/matter
> quanta in the Universe.
> All matter consists of unitons and all interactions in the Universe
> are consequences of
> interacting unitons.
>
> In my treatise I show that the total latent energy E inside a given
> amount of matter with mass m is given by E = m*c^2 where c is the
> velocity of light. And the expression m*c^2 is a measure of the TOTAL
> KINETIC ENERGY OF THE UNITONS of which the matter consists.
> Kinetic energy is the most fundamental form of energy.
>
> By the above recognition of our physical world it is not difficult to
> understand that all matter,
> regardless of its chemical appearance contains energy as given by
> Einstein's famous equation.
>
> Read more in section 13 and section 14 of my treatise:  http://www.rostra.dk/louis
>
> Best regards
> Louis Nielsen
> Denmark

You do understand that you are using the wrong relativistic formula
for kinetic energy?