🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 4, 1:34 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
> Do Gravitomagnetic Forces explain the Pioneer-Anomaly?

No.

>
> By Louis Nielsen,  http://www.rostra.dk/louis
>
> The Pioneer-anomaly is the observed and unexplained small deceleration
> of the space-probes Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 when they exit the solar-
> system.

Outgassing + slightly asymmetric thermal profile.

>
> Can the Pioneer-anomaly be explained as an effect caused by the
> Gravitomagnetic field around the Solar-system?

No.

> It could be relevant to calculate the magnitude of the gravitomagnetic
> field around the solar-system.
> Comments?
>
> Maxwell analogical field-equations for two gravitational fields.

ruh roh rhaggy

A model of gravitation based upon Maxwell's equations means planetary
orbits inspiral in a few hundred million years.

The technical term for this is "wrong".

I can't tell yet... are you ignorant or stupid?

> Around a mass, which is in relative motion to an observer, there
> exists a gravitational rotational vector-field, also called the
> gravitomagnetic field, beside the known gravitostatic vector-field
> (the newton-field).

Wrong.

There is no gravitational analog of current.

> Because Newton's gravitostatic law for gravitational masses is
> mathematical identical to Coloumb's electrostatic law for electric
> charges, we can derive equations for the two gravitational fields
> which are mathematical identical to Maxwell's equations for
> electromagnetic fields.

ruh roh rhaggy

>
> The two gravitational fields are defined according to a gravitational
> force-law analogical to the Lorentz force-law in electromagnetism.

Um. The Lorentz [nee Minkowski] force law defines what force a charge
will feel in the presence of electromagnetic fields.

Maxwell's equations define the fields.

> You can study the mathematical derivation of the gravitational
> equations in part 6 in my treatise.

Yep, stupid.

>
> The magnitude of the gravitomagnetic force is very, very small around
> moving masses in our everyday life. But around fast moving and great
> masses the magnitude of the gravitomagnetic forces is greater and
> relevant for different phenomena in the Universe.

...and it would predict that gravitational radiation is dipole based
and that there is no time dilation.

Sorry, your theory sucks. It is DOA.

>
> Best regards
> Louis Nielsen
> Denmarkhttp://www.rostra.dk/louis