🚀 go-pugleaf

On 1 Aug., 15:05, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <d...@aol.com> wrote:
> Dear Loius_N:
>
> <Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk> wrote in message
>
> news:1185968975.751450.270780@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> ...
>
> > My question to all of you:
> > Is it ultimately found that the Universe is in an
> > accelerated expansion and is it ultimately found
> > that the acceleration is positive or can it be that
> > the acceleration is negative?
>
> According to standard Big Bang Theory, the Universe initially
> inflated very rapidly, then decelerated to a fairly slow pace for
> a long period of time, then accelerated to what we see now.
>
> > And what are the measured (calculated) values
> > of the expansion-acceleration?
>
> http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~huchra/hubble/
>
> > PS: Is the observed acceleration-anomaly of the Pioneer
> > Probes explained by the above considerations?
>
> That is a good thought.  The magnitude is about right, but the
> direction is wrong... rather than ... "expansion" it is
> "contraction", and several "mechanical" candidates for this
> anomalous acceleration.
>
> You might want to peruse this:http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0203151
>
> David A. Smith

Dear David A. Smith
Thank you for your comments and the links which I will study.

The Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 have an unexplained very small
*deceleration* which is the same as a *negative acceleration* as in my
calculation. So I think that the direction is not wrong?
What are the measured magnitudes of the velocities of the Pioneer
Probes? Have you knowledge about that?

Best regards
Louis Nielsen
Denmark